What do terms like "I yield back" and "I reclaim my time" and "I yield to..." mean? I sorta get it, but am still quite clueless as to the details, let alone any name it may have.

  • This question is tagged with senate-rules, but is it explicitly about the United States Senate? Aug 21, 2017 at 1:56
  • 1
    @indigochild It is also tagged with "united-states", so presumably so. Though most legislative systems based off of the British Parliament will be extremely similar in how debates function. But technically speaking the US Senate does not have a Speaker as presiding officer (that's the VP), so I imagine the OP is really asking about the House of Representatives. Aug 21, 2017 at 3:17
  • 4
    @zibadawatimmy - Asking for clarification so that we can either clean up the tags or the question. If the tags are correct, we should edit the question. If the question is correct, we should edit the tags. It just isn't clear which to do yet. Aug 21, 2017 at 3:41
  • 1
    The question seems to be mixing up the House and Senate a little bit. I'm far from a Senate procedure expert, but as I understand it, there's no Speaker in the Senate, there's a presiding officer, and you address him or her as "Mr. President" or "Madam President," with all remarks directed to the presiding officer. The House has a Speaker (of the House), and you call him or her "Mr. Speaker" or "Madam Speaker." You wouldn't address the Speaker in the Senate, because that's the wrong chamber. Aug 21, 2017 at 4:53

3 Answers 3


These are technical requirements imposed by the rules of debate. The current rules used by the US Congress are (based on) Robert's rules.

Rules of debate are meant to help maintain order and decorum amongst people who may have wildly different opinions on matters, and to facilitate a timely and smooth legislative process.

The phrases in particular you mention are relevant to various limits on how many times, when, and for how long a person may speak, and what they are allowed to do with the time they are allotted. If they are permitted to let someone else speak during their time, they may "yield [their time] to" that other entity; if they were already speaking on someone else's time, they may "yield [the remaining time] back to [the original person]". The original speaker would then reclaim their time. In each case "yield" is essentially a synonym for "give to" or "give back".

I'll also add that in your title question, the use of "Mr. Speaker" is another one of the formalities of the rules: anyone currently speaking is required to address everything to the Speaker (who controls the debate and chooses the rules). This is meant to prevent personal attacks, which would be easy to fall into on contentious issues.

A lot of this is nicely detailed in the following Congressional Research Report from 2016, concerning how time is managed in the House.

  • As a side note, this is something not specific to the United States. I know at least the Dutch and British parliament have very similar rules and I suspect many others do as well.
    – Mast
    Aug 21, 2017 at 14:23
  • I was always under the impression that Robert's Rules of Order were based on the rules of the US House of Representatives, (with modifications to make them more general) rather than the other way around as you seem to say in your first paragraph. Do you have a citation to support that second sentence? Aug 21, 2017 at 18:39
  • 2
    @MontyHarder Wikipedia says you're right - that RONR is based on the US House rules, rather than the US Congress using RONR - and sources it to p. xliii of RONR (11th ed.) (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert%27s_Rules_of_Order#cite_ref-3), but I wouldn't be surprised if both Congress and the Robert's Rules Association had taken ideas and inspiration from each other, over the years.
    – wersimmon
    Aug 21, 2017 at 22:07

In the United States Senate, if cloture is not invoked, Senators can speak for as long as they want. However, often cloture is invoked. If it is, then according to the Senate rules:

Thereafter no Senator shall be entitled to speak in all more than one hour on the measure, motion, or other matter pending before the Senate, or the unfinished business, the amendments thereto, and motions affecting the same, and it shall be the duty of the Presiding Officer to keep the time of each Senator who speaks. ...

After no more than thirty hours of consideration of the measure, motion, or other matter on which cloture has been invoked, the Senate shall proceed, without any further debate on any question, to vote on the final disposition thereof... The thirty hours may be increased by the adoption of a motion, decided without debate, by a threefifths affirmative vote of the Senators duly chosen and sworn, and any such time thus agreed upon shall be equally divided between and controlled by the Majority and Minority Leaders or their designees.

Notwithstanding other provisions of this rule, a Senator may yield all or part of his one hour to the majority or minority floor managers of the measure, motion, or matter or to the Majority or Minority Leader, but each Senator specified shall not have more than two hours so yielded to him and may in turn yield such time to other Senators.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this rule, any Senator who has not used or yielded at least ten minutes, is, if he seeks recognition, guaranteed up to ten minutes, inclusive, to speak only.

So, pretty much, every Senator gets an hour of debate (although this is to a maximum of 30 hours unless they extend the time.) If you don't want to use your hour, or only want to use part of it, you can yield some or all your time to your majority or minority leader, and they can then in turn yield that time to another Senator, who can then use that time to exceed their hour.

Your question includes the phrase "Mr. Speaker". I don't believe that would be used in the Senate - instead, that would be used in the House. The House rules have the same concept of yielding time, but the rules are somewhat different.


When an MP is giving a speech in parliament, another MP can stand up to ask a question or give information. The speaking MP can accept or decline to take the question. If he wishes to accept the question he addresses the Speaker of the house to say that he yields his take to x MP's question. Since it his time to speak he can choose whether to allow anyone else to speak during that bit of time, in exactly the same way if he wishes to stop the question MP from talking he can "reclaim" his time.

  • 1
    Neither the terminology, nor the concept of yielding or reclaiming time, apply to the UK parliament. If there are other parliaments where this does apply, then please specify. (An MP can "give way" (that is the particular phrase used) to another MP who wishes to ask a brief question or make brief a comment, and it does indeed come out of the first MP's time; but that is not quite the same thing.) Aug 21, 2017 at 8:50

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .