Ancient Athens, what is by many considered the first democracy, resorted extensively to sortition to assign its political offices. In modern times however the only place where this method of selection remains in widespread use is for selecting trial juries. What would be the main advantages and disadvantages of using sortition in politics? Specially in the case of bodies large enough so that they can be considered statistically representative of the population at large.

1 Answer 1


I will give a list of what can be considered advantages and disadvantages. If any point is not clear, please ask for clarification in the comments and I'll amend the answer.


  • Effective representation of the interests of the people
  • Fairness & Equality
  • Democratic
  • Less corruptible than elections
  • Fair representation
  • Power to ordinary people
  • Voter fatigue
  • Loyalty is to conscience not to political party


  • Pure sortition does not discriminate
  • Misrepresentation
  • Sortition can put in power people with minority views
  • Voting confers legitimacy
  • Some forms of sortition entail compulsion
  • Enthusiasm of the representatives
  • Accountability
  • I believe the fact that an allotted body is less corruptible is debatable (although I personally tend to agree it would be). As for compulsion, although it might be desirable to properly represent the people, it seems to be in no way an intrinsic requirement of sortition, or am I missing something?
    – Fela
    Dec 8, 2012 at 13:11
  • Regarding corruption, I do agree that sortition alone is no guarantee for it, but it could help with the problem because you can not promise sth. that has implications beyond your "reign". In some forms of sortition you would not need to accept the result but you would be put in power whether you like it or not, that is the compulsion I was talking about. Should I clarify that in the answer? Dec 8, 2012 at 13:14
  • As I see it, if one thinks compulsion would have more cons than pros, the obvious solution is to allow people to refuse and simply draw somebody else in their place. In this sense sortition does not have to include compulsion, unless yo think it is an advantage having it. You could still argue compulsion is the best way to implement sortition over all, but has some undesired consequences (which ones?).
    – Fela
    Dec 8, 2012 at 13:23
  • That's why I put it as "Some forms of sortition entail compulsion" Compulsion needs to be considered a negative effect as it is an effect against the free will of somebody. Even if we could alleviate the effect it would imho still be a negative one. Dec 8, 2012 at 13:26
  • 1
    Sven, I now see the points seem to be almost identical to those of wikipedia, you should have credited the source.
    – Fela
    Dec 9, 2012 at 22:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .