The BBC describes Navalny as Putin's main opposition rival (example article), despite the fact that he has rarely scored over 2% in opinion polls (at least two other opposition candidates score ≥6%). Navalny alleges that his candidacy rejection is politically motivated, but what political motivation would Putin have to bar a candidate with such an apparently low popularity from standing?


8 Answers 8


The spin on Navalny

For the question of why Navalny is labeled by western media as Putin's main opposition rival is an issue of framing. If you look at the two candidates who were ahead of Navalny last he was included in opinion polls on the link you provided - Zyuganov (now Grudinin) and Zhirinovsky, members of the Communist party and the populist-nationalist LDPR party respectively - both are older men from older established Russian parties (both have been around since the early 90s, contrasted with Navalny's party's inception in 2012) with ideologies the west doesn't care for so neither make for as good a story as Navalny

Navalny is not the next most favored politically to rival Putin given opinion polls, but he is the strongest contrast to Putin of any of the potential candidates, having labeled Putin's United Russia party a Party of Crooks and Thieves and having organized several protests of corruption and current leadership. He is ideologically further from and more opposed to the current regime than the other greatest contenders.

Reasons for barring Navalny

As for why Putin would bother to bar him from the election, it is important to consider that it is not only this election cycle and presidential term that Putin is taking these actions in consideration of. Putin has sidestepped and even rewritten the Russian constitution to give himself more time in power. To believe that Putin will completely relinquish power over the country he will have led for 24 years only because it is legally ordained would be, I believe, naive. And so, the reasons Putin has barred Navalny would be more forward-facing than just this election.

A strong reason would be to prevent this from turning into a slippery slope for Putin's power going forward. Navalny's party, the Progress Party, was created only in 2012 and has become quite prominent in a short time. Being very ideologically opposed to this party, Putin would not want to give any legitimacy to this party. Perhaps this election they only get 2% of the vote, but that means Navalny getting his message out for a whole election season, televised alongside the rest of the contenders. Navalny is young and charismatic, the next election would have the chance to be quite different.

Another reason would be that Putin has a goal of what he calls 70 at 70, or 70% voter turnout with 70% voting for Putin. Part of maintaining the strongman image he has cultivated is by dominating any challenge. Anything that could be construed as weakness needs to be quashed. 70% of the vote is a lot, and any chip at that is significant. Barring someone from entry is an extreme move towards this end, but this is not the only reason Navalny is barred (see above).

  • 9
    There could also be a personal reason: for many years Navalny has publicly called Putin a thief and even produces a set of imagery with this motto. Also, Navalny is known to have a wide support among underage schoolchildren, who may or may not continue supporting him as they grow up, and Putin may be trying to prevent the former (although barring him from elections seems to achieve exactly opposite result).
    – Spc_555
    Commented Jan 29, 2018 at 23:28
  • 3
    @VasilyAlexeev I believe Zhirinovsky has called Putin, Obama and perhaps God himself a thief and worse during his famous parliament speeches. But I guess he's so cute when upset that nobody can stay angry with him. Commented Jan 30, 2018 at 10:20
  • 4
    @DmitryGrigoryev no one takes seriously what Zhirinovsky says, even himself
    – Spc_555
    Commented Jan 30, 2018 at 13:15
  • Another reason would be that Putin has a goal of what he calls 70 at 70, or 70% voter turnout with 70% voting for Putin. Interestingly enough, and counter-intuitively, this means only 49% of adult population actually voting for him.
    – Bregalad
    Commented Apr 8, 2019 at 6:33
  • 1
    @RS Because 0.7*0.7=0.49 ; If 70% of people votes and 70% of them votes for a candidate it means a short majority of people either didn't vote or voted for another candidate. It's counterintuitive because when we say 70% turnout and 70% of votes for a candidate, at first glance it sounds like there's massive support for that candidate.
    – Bregalad
    Commented Oct 11, 2020 at 16:23

From what I gather (mostly by observing Russian internet trolls, mind you, and by being a Russian internet troll myself), the main reasons are:

  • Putin supporters claim very high, nearly unanimous level of, well, support for Putin. Those "minus two percent" may look insignificant enough, but keep in mind that Navalny's supporters are probably the most discontent and politically active part of the population, so most of them would go vote, while many Putin's supporters wouldn't, because why bother, he wins every election anyway. Therefore the number of actual votes Navalny gets could be much higher that what you get from randomized opinion polls. Not enough to win, but maybe enough to shake the image of "unanimity". (IIRC, he ran for the mayor of Moscow and his numbers, although not winning, were surprisingly high.)

  • Lawfully or not, Navalny was accused of some crimes and sued before. Quite possibly for purely political reasons, e. g. to remove him from the political stage when it wasn't clear how much support he is going to get. Even though it could now work in Putin's favor to let him stand for election so that everybody could see his paltry 2%, that would require dropping the criminal charges, thus admitting they were politically motivated in the first place, thus admitting Putin was not so confident in his unanimous support and would use unlawful means of silencing his opponents, etc., etc. Not gonna happen.

  • Now, Navalny mostly gets support through internet-based media, he has no access to national TV, etc., which cuts off a big part of his potential audience. That would change if he is allowed to run for the election, because then he would have some mandatory TV time. Probably not gonna get many more supporters among the older generation of people who don't use internet, but who knows. (this is mentioned in the @Gramatik's answer as well)

If the [illusion of] unanimity is so important, why not bar the other contenders (Communists, LDPR etc.)? They are widely regarded as Kremlin's convenient "pocket opposition": they know their place; their opposing stances are quite moderate; they've been in politics since forever, always get their share of votes, but nothing significant ever comes out of it. Besides, giving people an [illusion of] choice is also important.


When reading about this, I cannot help but remember the party-state system within communist states. While currently there are six parties within the Russian Duma making Russia a multi-party system, United Russia clearly dominates the Russian politics.

According to this article, Russian authorities recognize the de facto one party system:

Dmitry Medvedev cautions opponents of Russia's de facto one party system Dmitry Medvedev, the Russian president, warned anti-Kremlin opposition politicians on Thursday against adopting radical tactics, promising he would head off any attempts to undermine the de facto one party system set up by Vladimir Putin.

This was happening 9 years ago, but things have not changed very much in the mean time:

Elections in Russia have established a de facto one-party system at the State Duma - "United Russia" will have about 340 seats, which is a constitutional majority

While 2% might not look like much, this actually means about 2 million persons and his actions are quite visible.

Alexei Navalny, a charismatic anti-corruption lawyer. Although Russia’s government-controlled election committee wants to keep Navalny off the ballot, the 41-year-old opposition leader has been campaigning across Russia for months. His campaign has attracted tens of thousands of young people as volunteers and raised over a million dollars in donations from ordinary Russians. Putin has called opposition figures like Navalny “national traitors.

”Navalny’s success has provoked a series of vicious attacks by pro-Kremlin activists (...)

  • 2
    2% of the Russian population is about three million people. But there are only about 110M people registered to vote, so 2% of them is more like two million people. Commented Jan 29, 2018 at 21:23
  • 2
    @DavidRicherby - True, but I don't think Putin's necessarily worried about losing the vote more than he is worried about having 3 million people having political ideas different or in opposition to his/his party, and becoming vocal about it.
    – BruceWayne
    Commented Jan 29, 2018 at 22:44
  • 2
    @BruceWayne A lot of the people who aren't eligible to vote are small children who don't have any political ideas. Commented Jan 29, 2018 at 23:10
  • 2
    @DavidRicherby - yes, you are right. I should have used register voters count, not population count. Fixed it. Thanks.
    – Alexei
    Commented Jan 30, 2018 at 5:14

Navalny is not as unknown in Russia as those polls may suggest. When he started his political career, he was gradually gaining popularity to the point he scored 27% in Moscow mayoral elections, 2013. Presumably, around this time Russian political establishment realized they are seeing a real competition emerging: criminal charges against Navalny, largely believed to be a mean of political harassment, started in 2012. These cases got a broad coverage in the government-controlled media, and naturally had a negative impact on Navalny's popularity.

Two among the most popular candidates, Zhirinovsky and Zyuganov, have participated in every presidential election since at least 2000. There is a hearsay that they don't have the aim to actually challenge the party in power, rather, they are used to draw away protest votes from the real opposition. Their presence also makes Russia look more democratic, so there's no reason to bar them.

  • 1
    27% of mayoral elections is his highest accomplishment. But in the rest of the country he has like 2-4% of support. Commented Sep 4, 2020 at 12:20
  • @dan-klasson Yes, according to honest Bender's official opinion polls. Commented Sep 4, 2020 at 12:38
  • 1
    Not sure if by honest you are being sarcastic. Those are the numbers I have seen. I'm sure if that weren't the case there would be numerous foreign western polls that would disprove that. And I have seen none of those. And I'm also pretty certain if such polls existed, they would be widely reported on in western media. Yet they are not. Commented Sep 4, 2020 at 12:40
  • @dan-klasson I'm not being sarcastic about the polls specifically, more about the whole situation. My point is that Navalny is not unknown in Russia (worthy of being poisoned, heh), and his low support figures are largely due to the fact that he is depicted as a recidivist felon in state-controlled media. Commented Sep 7, 2020 at 7:29

You may be over-relying on published polling numbers. It certainly seems Putin isn't relying on them as much as you are. I think you've correctly identified that he seems to see something you aren't seeing by looking at the polls.

Gary Kasparov, chess grandmaster and founder of opposition group United Civil Front*, when asked about polling in Russia, has argued that since Russia doesn't really have freedom of speech, any public polling done in that country that touches on the leadership is essentially meaningless.

Here he is making this point to NPR a decade ago:

MONTAGNE: And yet various polls have put President Vladimir Putin's popularity as high and sometimes above 70 percent.

Mr. KASPAROV: Oh, absolutely. This is true if you ignore one very important fact. You don't run normal polls asking personal questions in a police state. I'm sure that Saddam Hussein's popularity, a few days before American tanks rolled in Baghdad, was also 99 percent.

When you call to an average Russian asking about Putin, the president of the country and the KGB officer, you don't expect a true answer. If the same person asked about other issues - economy, crime, security, living standards, you receive very different answers.

* - ...and also barred from running against Putin in 2008

  • 2
    So the point you (and Mr. Kasparov) are making is that many people who don't support Putin are afraid to say so because of a fear of persecution? This is just wrong. Maybe a public person would not want to make an open statement about the matter, but a random Ivan on the street?
    – Headcrab
    Commented Jan 31, 2018 at 8:04
  • 4
    @Headcrab - He'd know better than I what things are like there. I do know quite often I hear about people over there getting beaten to death over not being 100% politically supportive of Putin. If some random person came to me asking political questions about a politician who people are known to get beaten to death for publicly criticizing, I'd suspect a trap.
    – T.E.D.
    Commented Jan 31, 2018 at 14:27
  • 4
    @Headcrab - No. The last time a journalist was killed in the USA (a country with far more of them) was 3 years ago, and it was a domestic dispute. In Russia 4 were killed last year alone. That is not normal, and I find any attempt to normalize killing human beings for their speech highly offensive.
    – T.E.D.
    Commented Jan 31, 2018 at 15:57
  • 4
    @Headcrab - Not in a Democratic country, it is not.
    – T.E.D.
    Commented Feb 1, 2018 at 1:52
  • 4
    ...and that was over a decade ago! You have to go back Three decades to tally up four of them like Russia got last year. Again, you are trying to normalize what amounts to a human rights violation, like murder is some mere occupational hazard of daring to speak. This is very, very offensive. Please stop.
    – T.E.D.
    Commented Feb 1, 2018 at 2:00

  Navalny and his supporters are being used to undermine rule of law in Russia.

Both Navalny and his Western handlers are aware that he currently has low support in Russian population, so they are not trying to win elections or even become significant opposition at this time. Instead, they are deliberately breaking Russian law and trying to get away with it in the name of "democracy". For example, Navalny often calls for unsanctioned demonstrations where and when he pleases. When authorities sometimes ban these gatherings, he deliberately pushes on and tries to get arrested, and then Western media start their usual propaganda about Russia not being democratic etc.

This tactic has already being used in so called "colored revolutions" both in Russia and abroad. Some tiny minority of pro-Western extremists must be allowed to break law (for example, remember "Pussy Riot" incident), otherwise Western propaganda machine will declare country as undemocratic. Nevermind that Russian Duma has more dissenting options and more political parties then US Congress where Democrats and Republicans are often described as Uniparty. Western media in their role of "moral arbiter" would immediately declare country as dictatorship, and political class would follow with sanctions.

And if Russia backs down in name of "democracy" and allows Navalny to break law in one way, he and other Western backed groups would immediately seize opportunity to go even further. Gradually, they would become stronger as those above the law, and finally we would have Ukrainian scenario where certain groups of "demonstrators" change "undemocratic and corrupt" government violently in the street.

Therefore, it is quite clear that Russian authorities must not back down an inch, and must upheld Russian law no matter what Western media tells about them.

  • 5
    Although the contents of this answer may be debatable, I upvote it because it is valuable contribution as a different perspective compared to the others.
    – gerrit
    Commented Jan 31, 2018 at 8:40
  • 3
    @gerrit It is debatable. In fact, Russian authorities often do authorize the meetings (e.g. Bolotnaya Square), then relabel these meetings "mass riots" after the fact and land the prominent participants in prison. That's how Navalny got arrested and sentenced to 15 days of prison in December 2011. Commented Feb 1, 2018 at 12:33
  • 1
    @DmitryGrigoryev That sounds plausible. It's hard to westerners to independently verify what is going on.
    – gerrit
    Commented Feb 1, 2018 at 13:00
  • 2
    Er, in what sense were Pussy Riot "allowed to break [the] law"? They were convicted and sent to jail for two years. And the "Western propaganda machine" does declare Russia undemocratic precisely because of this kind of thing. Also, your claim that the two main parties in the US function as one is pretty laughable in the context of the last 12 months. Commented Feb 1, 2018 at 16:47
  • 3
    @Acccumulation These are not Putin's restrictions, because despite Western propaganda Putin does not control everything in Russia, nor does he write every law. These are fairly normal restrictions borrowed from European legal systems even before Putin came to power.
    – rs.29
    Commented Feb 2, 2018 at 4:24

This was touched on in an article by AP:

  • Navalny manages widely popular YouTube accounts. (Conspicuously however, the article does not go into detail about how popular those accounts are within Russia)
  • Navalny has been campaigning with the aim not to get elected himself, but rather to defeat United Russia. He has done this by promoting candidates who are most likely to defeat United Russia's candidates. This campaigning has been mildly successful, and Navalny has indicated he will do it again in 2021's parliamentary elections.

In 2019, the project helped opposition candidates win 20 of 45 seats on the Moscow city council, and regional elections last year saw United Russia lose its majority in legislatures in three cities.

  • Unnamed analysts believe Navalny is capable of influencing the 2021 parliamentary elections, but the article doesn't go into detail.

Reading between the lines a little, it seems (if we assume that Putin is indeed actively barring Navalny from participating), it's not because Navalny threatens to win, but rather because Navalny can cause Putin's favored candidates to lose even though he won't win himself.

  • I'm not sure how barring Navalny would stop Navalny from promoting other candidates or managing widely popular Youtube accounts, but maybe my thinking does not have the same reference frame as Putin.
    – gerrit
    Commented Jan 22, 2021 at 12:47
  • [sarcasm] if only there were a way to silence Navalny from promoting other candidates or managing popular Youtube accounts.[/sarcasm]
    – CGCampbell
    Commented Jan 22, 2021 at 18:01
  • @gerrit presumably imprisoning Navalny will have an impact, though. Or the idea that Putin is barring Navalny is incorrect; the "face value" explanation given by the Russian authorities is correct.
    – Allure
    Commented Jan 22, 2021 at 20:42


It’s never good to be caught on camera attempting a coup in your country with a foreign intel service.

In this video, Navalny's top aide Vladimir Ashurkov is asking MI6 Officer James William Thomas Ford for $10-20 Million a year to start a color revolution in Russia.

This is why he was arrested.

  • This doesn't answer the question.
    – gerrit
    Commented Mar 22 at 7:07
  • @gerrit Logic dictates, if he was arrested for this, likely his participation in the election is yet lesser welcomed by the Russian political and criminal system.
    – Gray Sheep
    Commented Mar 22 at 7:57
  • @gerrit He could not survive. He died in the prison. More likely the FSB killed him, but - considering that his body was given to his wife, although with a huge delay - maybe he died on natural cases (which was significantly worsened by the imprisoning). Probability of a stroke can be greatly increased by simple blood anticoagulants. However, dealing with opposite security services is not considered as a democratic right anywhere on the world and is being honored by a long prison term even in the USA.
    – Gray Sheep
    Commented Mar 22 at 8:05
  • But he even was arrested, but not for color revolutions. Because there are some finance crimes from Navalniy: taxes, bribes, threats, extortions... You can check it out in any favour website. But this fact may be hided for non-Russian speaking users, because there are no pros for gov to translate it to English: we are talking Russian.
    – Egor
    Commented Mar 23 at 10:06
  • @Egor Yes. But I think these had not worth 19 years. Things became out-of-order from this MI6 thingy. I think, doing the same in the USA had resulted 20 years or more.
    – Gray Sheep
    Commented Mar 23 at 16:18

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .