I was watching a Vox video on gerrymandering in Pennsylvania, and thought how lucky I am that gerrymandering is not generally considered to be much of a problem here in Australia. Some states had clear gerrymandering in past decades (the states have independent electoral commissions), but at the federal level the Australian Electoral Commission is well respected and considered to be non-partisan.

How does Australia ensure its Australian Electoral Commission remains free of partisan bias? What regulations guard it, who is responsible for evaluating its decisions, and what consequences could they bring if gerrymandering was identified?

  • 😄😄 Luckily India also has a fairly independent electoral commission. Even though the people who are selected for India's electoral commission are selected by the current Indian government , but once after being elected, government cannot control or interfere with the electoral commission's decision , which has very strict guidelines - It's just like SCOTUS , current president can nominate SCOTUS but cannot force them to agree on something , after they have elected as a supreme court justice.
    – user17709
    Mar 14, 2018 at 5:41

1 Answer 1


The AEC is headed by a Commission consisting of three people appointed by the Special Minister of State:

  • a chairperson, who must be a current or retired judge of the Federal Court selected from a list of three nominees given by the Chief Justice of the Federal Court
  • a non-judicial member, who is almost always the Australian Statistician (the head of the Australian Bureau of Statistics)
  • the Electoral Commissioner, who acts as the day-to-day CEO of the AEC and is responsible for actually running elections.

None of these appointments can be terminated except by the Governor-General with cause. The same goes for the Deputy Electoral Commissioner, and the Australian Electoral Officer for each State/Territory (who is responsible for certain electoral functions in each state, and is usually also the AEC's State Manager).

Now, the Commission isn't directly responsible for drawing up electorate boundaries. That task goes to the Redistribution Committee for the State/Territory, which is assembled every time a redistribution is required.

The Redistribution Committee consists of:

  • the Electoral Commissioner
  • the AEO for the State
  • the State's Surveyor-General
  • the State's Auditor-General

The Surveyor-General and Auditor-General are state officials. The Auditor-General is usually covered by similar protections as the Electoral Commissioner - i.e. they can't be dismissed without legitimate cause.

After the committee has done its work and approved a proposed map (through several rounds of public consultation and public objections), the map has to be approved by the Augmented Electoral Commission, which consists of all three members of the Electoral Commission plus the other members of the Redistribution Committee for that state/territory.

There is absolutely no route of appeal to any court against a decision of the Augmented Electoral Commission to approve a redistribution proposal, as long as it complies with the Constitution - the process depends on the members of the committee acting in an unbiased manner and following the requirements that the law sets out for defining fair boundaries.

Outside of redistributions, the AEC requires all its employees to be "politically neutral" (i.e. not to participate in political activities such as campaigning or openly expressing personal political views) and to sign declarations accordingly.

When it comes to the actual conduct of elections and referendums, results can be appealed to the High Court as the Court of Disputed Returns, which can choose to inquire into whatever matters it needs to understand to determine whether the result of an election is valid.

More generally, the AEC reports to the Parliament's Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters which provides political oversight. Other oversight bodies like the Australian National Audit Office and the Commonwealth Ombudsman can also investigate the AEC. However, these bodies can only review the AEC's operations and give advisory recommendations - they don't have any power to direct the AEC.

So overall, the AEC's neutrality is ensured by:

  • all senior officers being protected by law from arbitrary dismissal, thus encouraging independence from government interference
  • the Commission, which oversees the AEC's work, being headed by a member of the judiciary and with oversight from another senior public servant
  • redistributions being conducted with the help of state officials who are similarly non-partisan public servants, and conducted according to regulations which mandate multiple rounds of public consultation
  • all employees being required to be politically neutral
  • the AEC's permanent staff being drawn from the Australian Public Service which is generally non-partisan
  • oversight from the Parliament and other Commonwealth oversight bodies

In contrast, most US states have redistricting conducted by partisan members of the Legislature who are not required to give regard to fairness, and electoral officials are often openly partisan elected officers like the Secretary of State.

Of course, a lot of the AEC's reputation is based on the non-legal norms they have traditionally upheld, and successive Australian governments haven't really tried to mess with the AEC's independence. It remains to be seen how resilient their structure is if that situation were to change.

  • Is there broad agreement (read: equal amount of dissatisfaction/complaints :) between parties that the Commission is indeed not biased partisanly?
    – user4012
    Mar 14, 2018 at 13:04
  • 1
    It's worth noting that the state offices of the AEC are not the same as the various state electoral commissions. Mar 14, 2018 at 17:26
  • 2
    @user4012: purely anecdotally, basically all of the serious criticism I've heard of the AEC has been focused on their operational mishaps such as the 2014 WA Senate election, rather than allegations of bias or partisanship.
    – ajd
    Mar 15, 2018 at 0:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .