Some people write bloated books and long essays with skilful use of hooks, e.g. Jared Diamond; some others speak in long-drawn sentences with torrents of words, e.g. Noam Chomsky. It reminds me of a tactic politicians use to waste people's time. I came across this word before but I can't retrieve it from either memory or the internet.
What is the name of the tactic that politicians use to bury people with torrent of words?
4This might be better on english.stackexchange.com, since it's more of a vocabulary question... or at least you're more likely to get an answer there.– BobsonMar 26, 2014 at 20:56
1Since when is verbosity a means of rhetorical dishonesty?– PubliusMar 27, 2014 at 4:27
1@GeorgeChen Don't patronize me please. I read your question, but I'm not sure I understand it. Wait. Filibuster?– PubliusMar 27, 2014 at 5:04
1Question has been re-asked here. Voting to close this one.– BobsonMar 27, 2014 at 13:30
1Answer from the other question is bloviate, which I don't think I've ever run across before.– BobsonMar 27, 2014 at 17:24
talk at length, esp. in an inflated or empty way.
*Kudos to bib on the English Language & Usage stack exchange.
1I can't believe someone mentioned "bloviate" on a politics related website and Bill O'Reilley's shadow didn't make an appearance– user4012Mar 31, 2014 at 14:22
1Sorry, I don't watch TV. Mar 31, 2014 at 17:14
Obfuscation may be the word you are looking for. It implies that a thing is being presented, but not necessarily in the most clear manner, often with the intent of deception on key details. That said, this may not be strictly political.
Maybe but I'm not sure. Obfuscation is aimed to make obscure. The word I'm searching for is aimed to consume people's waking hours. Mar 27, 2014 at 0:02
@GeorgeChen This is literally what you would do if you wanted to waste someones time. Unless you mean something more like talking over someone else, like on TV? Mar 28, 2014 at 4:10
Somewhat related is the Gish gallop https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop where you do an 'argument dump' to overwhelm your opponent.
This is a bit of a long shot, but:
It reminds me of a tactic politicians use to waste people's time.
This makes me think you're referring to the filibuster. The filibuster is a procedural tool in which a politician will just keep talking and talking in order to prolong debate and prevent the bill from coming to a vote.
Nowadays though, in the US Senate, you don't need to actually talk to filibuster. The procedural filibuster allows politicians to just announce that they are going to filibuster, at which point it takes a super-majority of votes to override the filibuster. However, a recent rules change means that it only takes a normal majority of votes to override a filibuster of a non-judicial presidential nominee.
Very close. But the tactic in question is also used in blogs and news articles where hooks are skilfully used to keep people reading on and on. Mar 27, 2014 at 5:19
What, like viral headlines and dull articles? I don't think there's a name for that, but that's not a politics question, it's an english one.– PubliusMar 27, 2014 at 5:20
It's a political one. It aims at distraction rather than deceit. Mar 27, 2014 at 5:32
I'm not totally sure I see the difference, and you're giving examples of its use in areas outside of politics. The English SE is full of people asking if there's a word for something. I don't think this is suited to this site unless it's a technical political term.– PubliusMar 27, 2014 at 5:40
You may also wish to consider the word 'inundate' as in to overwhelm with information.
The lawyers were inundated with useless credit card statements, but there was really one one charge that needed to be disclosed.
Good one. Still,there are occasions when one feels inundated but the materials that overwhelm this person are nevertheless necessary. Mar 28, 2014 at 17:51