Romanian Parliament is trying to adopt a law to cap the interest rates for all loans:

According to the form adopted by the Senate’s committees, the annual effective interest rate, also known as DAE, will be limited to maximum 2.5 times the legal interest rate for mortgage loans, and to 18% per year for consumer loans

Representatives of the banking sector who attended the debate on this draft bill in the Senate’s committees opposed the initiative of limiting interest rates

Some bank representatives and analysts argued that such a law will encourage illegal borrowing, as non-bank financial institutions currently use much higher interest rates and will be forced to refuse crediting some clients.

I could not find the reasons for introducing such a law, just a justification:

Zamfir [the initiator] claims that he got his inspiration from the model of 14 other EU countries and especially from Spain.

So, I am interested in the reasons behind interest rates capping in Spain.

Question: What are the main reasons for capping interest rates in Spain?

  • 2
    I think the reasons are all pretty much the same, it is the implementation that varies some between countries. Is it possible Zamfir is more familiar with Spanish law for some reason? I'm not sure Spain is actually relevant to Romanian policy.
    – user9389
    Commented Apr 26, 2018 at 15:44
  • @notstoreboughtdirt - the initiator claims that current proposal resembles already existing Spanish legislation and I assume that some reasons might be relevant. Currently, this is the best I have. I will see if I can find more information about this law.
    – Alexei
    Commented Apr 26, 2018 at 16:02

2 Answers 2


This would appear to be part of Spain's usury legislation.

Usury is the practice of lending at unreasonable levels of interest. Lenders offer loans at a very high rate of interest when they have a reasonable expectation that the loan won't be repaid. Thus they need to make sufficient profit on those loans that are repaid to cover losses on bad debts.

So if you are an employed person with a house you can get a secured loan at a good rate because the lender can expect to be paid in full. But if you don't have a steady income or security you will not be able to get a loan at a good rate. This leads to a cycle of debt, with unpaid loans being financed by more loans, at an ever-increasing rate of interest. And people being trapped in debt with no possibility of escape. People take out loans for short-term benefit, without considering the long-term consequences.

Spanish law says, in effect, "If you are so unlikely to be able to repay a loan that the lender feels that they need to charge a very high rate of interest, you should not be allowed to have a loan at all." By capping lending rates, the government is saying to lenders. "Don't loan to people who will have trouble repaying the debt." They are doing it to protect people from taking loans that will be ultimately not in their interest.

(about Spanish Usury Law)

  • 6
    For more on this general topic, search for information about "payday loans" in the US.
    – arp
    Commented Apr 26, 2018 at 18:16
  • 3
    It's a good philosophical question whether people's freedom should be curtailed in order to "protect them from themselves" Commented Apr 27, 2018 at 1:17
  • @BradThomas In this case you are not curtailing the buyers' freedoms directly. The loaners could still provide loans at the capped rate, they simply will refuse to because it would not be profitable for them.
    – JAB
    Commented Apr 27, 2018 at 4:45
  • 2
    Before this becomes a discussion of the philosophy, please remember that comments are used to suggest improvements or corrections, not for general discussion of a topic.
    – James K
    Commented Apr 27, 2018 at 5:42
  • It's not only protecting customers. We are still experiencing the effects of a severe crisis due to banks lending money way too happily. The law tries to prevent people getting trapped in debts they can't repay at the same time that limits banks' capability of playing russian roulette with the country's economy.
    – Rekesoft
    Commented Apr 30, 2018 at 10:39

James K's answer is correct about the reasons in favor of limiting interest rates1.

That said, since Spain's laws are specifically quoted, I would like to give some additional data.

First, there are three different rules:

  • for remunerative interest: what is usually understood as the interest.

  • for 'late' interest: interest to pay if the borrower delays in the payments.

  • for 'late' interest of mortgages.

For the first one, the regulatory basis is a law from 23 July of 1908 that declares void and null loans with excessive rates that are accepted because the borrower is in a situation of need(link in Spanish). It does not set a fixed limit, though, and sentences often differ; the link states that in a case a 20.5% rate was considered lawful by the Supreme Court, a 29% one abusive. In any case, I cannot find any reference to a "hard" limit2.

For 'late' interest rates in loans, recent sentences(link in Spanish) have capped those to 2 points over the remuneratory interest; if the remuneratory interest is 8% the late interest must be at max 10%. This is important because usury usually relies on people being unable to pay in time, the 'late' interest rates are overlooked by customers who believe they will be able to pay.

For 'late' mortgage interest rates, recent sentences by the Court of Justice3 of the European Union have set a cap of 2.5 times the legal interest of money. This limits is independent of the 2% limit above specified, so the minimum of both values should be applied. Also of interest is that it declares an abusive 'late' interest clause completely null; if the clause is abusive it is not to be "ammended" by the judge but completely ignored so the only appliable interest rate would be the renumerative.

Also, this last rulings have led to some courts recently setting a cap of 2.5 times the legal interest of money for the 'late' interest for personal loans, but AFAIK these rulings were done by lower courts and still there is no validation by the Supreme Court.

1You can see an example of what lawmakers want to avoid in this John Oliver program. And this other program about car loans is remarkably similar.

I would like to add that, unlike the USA, in Spain there is no possibility of filling for personal bankruptcy.

2A few years ago there was a series of sentences against chains of "small loans suppliers" who targetted high interest loans towards people who had difficult getting loans from banks; the judges considered that asking twice the interest rate of banks was usury.

3Like this one.

  • 2
    Not sure how this could have collected so many upvotes - it does not answer the question at all, which is very clear: What are the main reasons for capping interest rates in Spain?. OP is already aware that Spain has these laws.
    – pipe
    Commented Apr 27, 2018 at 9:31
  • @pipe - it had collected many upvotes because it provides a great insights on how these laws work in Spain. James K answer is the direct answer, but posts providing complementary information can be useful as well. OP has a main question, but also suggests that Romanian law projects is considered the closest to what it is currently in use in Spain. Providing information about how these laws look like is very useful.
    – Alexei
    Commented Apr 27, 2018 at 10:07
  • @pipe - the practice of providing complementary information is also used throughout StackOverflow. Have a more straightforward way of achieving a part from a suggested solution? Come and say it, because it will make life easier for future viewers.
    – Alexei
    Commented Apr 27, 2018 at 10:09
  • 1
    @Alexei Stack Exchange is not a discussion forum - It is a question and answer site where an answer is supposed to answer the question in isolation. This is in fact the whole point of Stack Exchange compared to tradition forums. Sure, this information could be useful, but a lot of things can be, and the Q&A format is designed to filter out information from people who just want to "help" but don't answer the actual question. If you want to know what the Spanish laws are, in detail, you can ask a separate question.
    – pipe
    Commented Apr 27, 2018 at 11:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .