It's easy enough to find a Europe-only comparative perspective on the politicization of the judiciary, e.g. Werkmann (2017):

enter image description here

The authors measured the level of politicization in each country with the Index of Party Patronage (IPP) which is calculated by using the median values for the range and depth of patronage in nine policy areas (i.e. Economy, Finance, Judiciary, Media, Military and Police, Foreign Service, Culture and Education, Health Care, and Regional and Local Administration) and three institutional types (i.e. ministerial departments, non-departmental agencies and commissions, and executing institutions). For the purpose of this study, the IPP is disaggregated to single out the level of politicization in the area of interest, i.e. the judiciary. The IPP ranges from 0, corresponding to complete absence of patronage practices, to 1 which indicates a full overlap of party and the state. Intermediate values are interpreted as follows. In general, a score of around 0.65 indicates that parties exert control over appointments in most institutions at all levels of the administration, a score of approximately 0.4 corresponds to partisan appointments in most institutions but only at top and middle levels, whereas a score of 0.1 means that party patronage occurs in a limited number of institutions and only at the top level. In the context of this study, a value of 0.4 thus translates to political appointments to top-level positions in the judiciary such as the chairman of court or senior judges, as well as middle positions in most of the national courts and the national ministry of justice. Scores on the bottom of the scale indicate that political parties are mostly uninvolved in the appointments to the judiciary

(You may or may not agree with this, and other studies [with different methodology] may have different results). What I want to ask here (with some relation to a recent question): are there trans-Atlantic studies measuring/comparing the level of politicization of the judiciary in most Western (or even OECD) democracies?

  • 1
    Interesting that German is on top here, if I'm not mistaken, the German constitutional court is quite powerful. – gerrit Oct 7 '18 at 11:56
  • 2
    @gerrit Perhaps that level of power correlates directly with the level of politicisation. After all, the US Supreme Court is very powerful and very politicised (though I can't back that up with a studt that compares it directly with European courts, else I would be posting an answer). While the UK Supreme Court is not powerful, and Britain has one of the least politicised judiciaries. – owjburnham Oct 7 '18 at 17:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.