Is a parliamentary system less likely to backslide into electoral authoritarianism than a presidential system just because of the PM being accountable to the legislature and the ease of a no confidence vote compared to impeachment?

  • 1
    I'm not sure how to answer this question, but I know one relevant example: Erdogan has recently moved Turkey from a parliamentary to a presidential executive in order to cement his power. I take that to indicate that he felt being president was better than being PM for an authoritarian leader. – Thomas Nov 14 '18 at 21:48
  • Hitler came to power in a parliamentary system but became President as well as Chancellor following a 1934 referendum. I'm not sure if this supports or opposes the OP's conjecture. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_referendum,_1934 – Stuart F Nov 15 '18 at 11:45
  • @StuartF Rather a “referendum” than a referendum. There was widespread intimidation and fraud, and cannot be considered as democratic. By the time of the “referendum”, the backsliding had already happened. – gerrit Nov 15 '18 at 14:33
  • Does this question fit better on History? – gerrit Nov 15 '18 at 14:34
  • 1
    @gerrit as asked, I don't think this question fits better on History. It's a theoretical question; historical evidence may be useful for considering different hypotheses, but the question itself is fairly abstract. – phoog Nov 15 '18 at 16:20

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.