2

Given the situation of water in Pakistan and seriousness that can be raised due to lack of water, why is the construction of dams in Pakistan so controversial? E.g., nowadays Mohmand Dam is very controversial and 10 years before Kala Bagh Dam was too controversial, but both are never on track.

Are there any restrictions that restrict Pakistan to build a dam or are the people too unfamiliar and unrealistic to understand the water problem it's trying to solve?

Why can't the Army take control on construction of the Dam? With the power of the Army in Pakistan, could it get things done without corruption or the new government of Imran Khan?

|improve this question

migrated from history.stackexchange.com Jan 3 at 19:43

This question came from our site for historians and history buffs.

  • 3
    And the politics is from the people that live upstream of the dam, who may be flooded out, and those downstream from the dam, who will face changes in water flow. A historical study would show what the issues are, and how they are solved. – Peter Diehr Jan 3 at 17:19
14

While damming a river can provide a large population with a reliable source of drinking water and an environmentally friendly source of electricity, it often has several negative consequences for the population in the vicinity of the dam:

  • The lake which will form on the upstream side of the dam might swallow privately owned lands, privately owned homes or even whole villages. For example, this picture from Lake Reschen in Italy shows you a church tower (European equivalent of a minaret) in the middle of a lake. It used to belong to a village which used to be home of several hundred people until a dam was built in the 1940s.
  • The downstream water system will be affected, which might lead to farmland which used to be fertile to become arid and might make fishing impossible where it used to be possible. Local farmers and fishers might fear for their existence.
  • If the river used to be suitable for ships, it likely won't be after the dam is built. This destroys local infrastructure and might have negative economic consequences.
  • Environmental concerns about the destruction of natural ecosystems.

This makes dam construction projects examples of Not-In-My-Backyard issues. Of course everyone wants clean water and clean energy for the country, but nobody wants their personal life destroyed because of it. So a vocal local minority will be willing to do anything to prevent such a project from being completed.

Why can't the Army take control on construction of the Dam?

Be careful what you wish for. Using the army to solve internal problems with force often leads to an escalation of conflicts which can lead to all out civil wars. Extending the responsibilities of the army to areas which are not their primary duty (defending the country against external aggressors) is creating a dangerous precedent which might lead to the army taking control of even more civil tasks and can end in a military dictatorship.

There is a reason why the most economically successful countries in the world solve such conflicts in a democratic manner. Talking things out and coming to compromises might be less efficient, but it leads to far fewer people getting imprisoned or shot.

|improve this answer
  • But like what u said, one cannot build a dam. In reaction a country could be lead to drought like condition which is happening in Pakistan where all parties expect few and they r opposed one fight to not have dam for many years for political gain while their kids study and life aboard – Nofel Jan 4 at 21:05

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.