2

Hypothetically, the United Kingdom has decided to separate, Czechoslovakia style, into England-and-Wales and Scotland. The UK ceases to exist with the two new countries as equal successor nations.

In Northern Ireland, the Nationalist community would prefer to join (The Republic of) Ireland. Which new country would the Unionist community prefer?

(For the purposes of this hypothetical, Brexit never happens and Queen Elizabeth II becomes Queen of the two new countries. I'm more interested in the long term rather than considering temporary blips.)

I understand that there isn't going to be a single definitive answer that 100% of that community are going to agree with. I'm interested if there have been any studies that have evaded my searches or simply the opinion of someone close to or part of that community.

| improve this question | | | | |
  • 2
    As things stand, definitely England and Wales. – user19831 Jul 4 '19 at 18:57
  • Here's the thing, the English and Scottish crowns had been united (in 1603) for over a century before the act of union between England (and Wales) and Scotland (in 1707). Since the Unionists of Northern Ireland identify with William of Orange (reign 1689 to 1702), presumably their view of 'The Union' is of a union that doesn't include Scotland?!?!? Note: the ancestors of the Ulster Protestants (mostly Unionists) are largely descended from Scots and northern English settlers who arrived in the island of Ireland between 1620 and 1720 – Dave Gremlin Jul 4 '19 at 21:17
  • @orangesandlemons if you add your connection to the unionist community, that would make a good answer. – billpg Jul 5 '19 at 20:23
3

The situation as you describe is unimaginable.

England+Wales is much larger than Scotland, a separation could never be an equal split. England and Wales would be universally seen as the successor to the UK and Scotland as a newly independent state.

However if we accept this hypothesis, and suppose that the constituents of Great Britain have decided to create a legal fiction of an equal division, then this supposes that a referendum has been held throughout the UK. So we also have to suppose a massive change in public opinion in England.

Given all these hypotheses, one can hardly predict how public opinion would also change in Northern Ireland. The current position of the majority is to remain in the UK, and England and Wales would be seen as the UK, so the Unionist community would choose to remain in a Union with England, and not with Scotland. But in the situation you describe any thing is possible.

It is analogous to asking "If the UK splits from the EU in a Czech style divorce, does Spain stay in union with France and Germanay, or with the UK"

| improve this answer | | | | |
  • Thanks for that answer. The hypothetical is really just to focus on the central question (What do the Unionists feel?) and I don't want to get hung up on it. Reality won't just glibly hand-wave away Brexit or Scottish Republicans either, but that isn't the question I'm asking. – billpg Jul 8 '19 at 11:23
  • """the Unionist community would choose to remain in a Union with England, and not with Scotland.""" – James K Jul 8 '19 at 21:21
0

Let's not forget the UDI option. An independent Northern Irish state, which some have asserted as being the only way to settle differences between the religious traditions once and for all.

If old "British" Ulster stands apart from the mother country, the mere need to coƶperate -- in order to survive -- would exceed those differences which were responsible for the rancour and violence of the not so distant past.

Though I'm an American, I fancy myself a Nationalist where Ireland is concerned. I don't think an independent Northern Ireland is all that viable, but I hold that it's one of the possible outcomes.

| improve this answer | | | | |

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .