Only a few days ago the Washington Post gave Schiff "four pinocchios" for his statements regarding his early contacts with the whistleblower. Interestingly, this sentence was part of the WaPo conclusions:
The explanation that Schiff was not sure it was the same whistleblower especially strains credulity.
But we now know there is actually a second whistleblower in the Trump-Ukraine call. Does this change anything with respect to the truth value of Schiff's statements? Have any news outlets re-evaluated those statements in light of the fact that there were two whistleblowers?