12

In the late 2000s, the Liberal Democratic party wanted a referendum on whether or not the UK should stay in the EU.

A decade later, they did not merely want a second referendum, but they wanted to cancel Brexit.

What prompted this shift in their position?

5
  • 7
    Are you sure it was a shift in stance? Asking for a referendum on EU membership may just have been a way to shut down the likes of Farage and the ERG, and to put the question to bed for another three decades - which is exactly why Cameron actually went ahead and ran the referendum. That didn't really work out well. Dec 26, 2019 at 7:36
  • Your comment could be an answer to my question.
    – Student
    Dec 26, 2019 at 7:45
  • 2
    Give me a couple of hours to wake up and consume a lot of coffee and I'll try to find references to deliver that in a form suitable as an answer, if nobody else does it in the meantime. Dec 26, 2019 at 7:47
  • @GeoffAtkins according to some, David Cameron thought the Lib Dems didn’t want an EU referendum - there’s that interview with Donald Tusk where Tusk claimed that the Lib Dems as a coalition partner in 2015 would remove any chance of a referendum happening, so it was an empty election promise. When Cameron won an outright majority, he screwed himself.
    – user16741
    Dec 26, 2019 at 8:17
  • @Moo that fits with the details in JamesK's answer below. LibDems wanted a referendum following evidence of a shift in the country towards pro-EU parties, i.e. themselves. Without that shift, so if they remained junior coalition partners, they would oppose a referendum.
    – Jontia
    Dec 26, 2019 at 17:06

1 Answer 1

15

There is no fundamental shift in stance, rather a shift in policy to achieve their aim.

The Liberal Democrats (and more particularly the SDP wing) have always been a pro-Europe party. The SDP split from Labour in part over the (then) Euroskeptic position of the Leadership. The SDP-Liberal alliance, and later the Liberal Democrats have been consistently the most pro-Europe of the major UK political parties.

In 2008 the policy was to cement the UK's position in the EU by holding a new referendum. Their goal was to secure a mandate for closer integration with the EU including membership of the Euro currency. In the unlikely event that they won a majority in Parliament, this would (they would have hoped) result in a significant majority for continued membership of the EU (if the Lib Dems had won, the country would have had to have swung significantly in favour of the EU, making a pro-EU result very likely)

They opposed the "renegotiate and referendum" policy of David Cameron, as they did not think the renegotiation process would yield significant benefits for Britain, and would, therefore, make an anti-Europe result more likely in the referendum.

Following the referendum, the Lib Dem's stance of "pro-Europe" has continued: initially they favoured an agreement that would have kept the UK in most of the EU structures, such as the Single Market and the Customs Union.

When it was clear that the government was negotiating a "hard" brexit that would result in the UK leaving the Single Market, they changed policy to holding a new referendum on the agreement (with their preferred option of not leaving on the ballot). In the 2019 election they maintained their pro-EU stance, but hardened it slightly by stating that a vote for the Lib Dems would indicate support for remaining in Europe, and if they won a majority, this would indicate sufficient support for Parliament to overrule the 2016 referendum, without a further vote.

So the pro-EU stance has been consistent, but the policy to achieve their aim has changed.

2008: Support pro-eu referendum
2015: Oppose renegotiation followed by referendum
2017: Support referendum on brexit deal (with option to remain)
2019: Oppose referendum, but prefer referendum to leaving the EU

1
  • 1
    Notably their goal in 2010 was to secure a mandate (via a referendum win) for closer integration with the EU including membership of the Euro currency
    – Valorum
    Dec 27, 2019 at 0:07

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .