0

From an interview with Noam Chomsky about his views on elections in Pakistan:

Coming to election issues, what do you think, sitting afar and as an observer, are the basic issues that need to be handled by whoever is voted into power?

NC: Well, first of all, the internal issues. Pakistan is not a unified country. In large parts of the country, the state is regarded as a Punjabi state, not their (the people's) state. In fact, I think the last serious effort to deal with this was probably in the 1970s, when during the Bhutto regime some sort of arrangement of federalism was instituted for devolving power so that people feel the government is responding to them and not just some special interests focused on a particular region and class. Now that's a major problem.

Pakistan is an Islamic state, why does Chomsky call it a Punjabi state?

  • 2
    You might want to rephrase the question, since there are a number of possible answers that probably aren't relevant. (Including "Because Chomsky is frequently wrong about things" :-)) – jamesqf Apr 3 at 18:49
  • Pakistan is an Islamic state, why does Chomsky call it a Punjabi state? You are comparing religion with an ethnic group. Punjabi people, not Punjabi religion. Punjabi people follow various religions: Sikhism, Hinduism, Islam, Baptist Christianity, Catholicism and Atheism. Not sure if there are Mormons, Laveyan Satanists. – Severus Snape Aug 20 at 3:17
2

He is just referring to the fact that the government in Islamabad (a Punjab region sort of) have not managed to give citizens from other regions a collective Pakistani mindset.

| improve this answer | |
  • Which is one of the problems in for example Latin America. But the US is also an example in – Stefan Skoglund Apr 4 at 15:51

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .