3

Recently announced:

"That means big and it means fast," [Trump] said of Operation Warp Speed. "A massive scientific, industrial and logistical endeavour unlike anything our country has seen since the Manhattan Project."

Mr Trump named an Army general and a former healthcare executive to lead the operation, a partnership between the government and private sector to find and distribute a vaccine.

Moncef Slaoui, who previously led the vaccines division at pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline, will lead the mission, while Gen Gustave Perna, who oversees distribution for the US Army, is to serve as chief operating officer.

So this COO post sounds like Operation Warp Speed is more like a corporation than a government department, but give the private-public partnership mention, I'm guessing more like a government-sponsored enterprise (GSE, like Fannie Mae etc.)? What I'm asking is basically, what's the exact legal position/incorporation of Project Warp Speed relative to the US government?

  • 7
    What evidence is there that this is any more real than Trump's other Coronavirus-related suggestions? – jamesqf May 16 at 3:54
  • @jamesqf: he says he appointed people to those posts. Is that a complete fabrication? I could find an article in Science a few days ago that said Trump's Warp plan was nebulous, but maybe it became clearer in the meantime? (Or maybe not, but an answer could clarify that.) – Fizz May 16 at 4:21
  • Not sure I understand: What about it makes it sound like a GSE? Just because the named leader of it is a former executive doesn't mean it will be a corporation. Can you clarify what about the statement made it sound like it would be a GSE? – Chipster May 16 at 4:34
  • @Chipster: What kind of COOs can Trump appoint? Are there COOs in any US gov't branch? Basically, I'm just trying to figure out what this Warp thing is, as a legal/administrative entity and how it relates to the US gov't since Trump can apparently appoint people there. – Fizz May 16 at 4:35
  • 6
    Given the "warp speed" title and the Space Force insignia, it's likely that certain aspects of Star Trek have made an impression on the President. – agc May 16 at 5:47
6

What I'm asking is basically, what's the exact legal position/incorporation of Project Warp Speed relative to the US government?

Incorporation is not required. Congress appropriated money for certain purposes. The president has a responsibility to spend that money in a manner consistent with the law. Operation Warp Speed is the name of the program to execute the law.


While almost always associated with business, a COO can exist independently of a corporation.

From Harvard Business Review, May 2006, Second in Command: The Misunderstood Role of the Chief Operating Officer.

One role of a COO is to lead the execution of strategies developed by the top management team. [...] Managing large, often global, enterprises sometimes requires two sets of hands; in such cases, the COO typically takes responsibility for delivering results on a day-to-day, quarter-to-quarter basis.

In this case, the "top management team" is in the White House. General Perna has been tasked with the execution of those strategies, thus chief operating officer.


That the appointment of a COO is reasonable for execution of those strategies is revealed by the framework and goals of the program.

HHS Press Release, May 15, 2020, Trump Administration Announces Framework and Leadership for 'Operation Warp Speed'.

Elements of Operation Warp Speed

Operation Warp Speed is a public-private partnership to facilitate, at an unprecedented pace, the development, manufacturing, and distribution of COVID-19 countermeasures, between components of HHS, including CDC, FDA, NIH, and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA); the Department of Defense; private firms; and other federal agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Veterans Affairs. It will coordinate existing HHS-wide efforts, including the NIH's ACTIV partnership for vaccine and therapeutic development, NIH's RADx initiative for diagnostic development, and work by BARDA.

Leadership: In addition to the expertise of Dr. Slaoui and General Perna, each countermeasure area will be overseen by a highly qualified and accomplished career HHS scientist:

  • Vaccines: Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., Director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research.

  • Therapeutics: Janet Woodcock, M.D., Director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.

  • Diagnostics: Bruce Tromberg, Ph.D., Director of the NIH's National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering.

The Department of the Defense (DoD) has identified subject matter experts to lead DoD support for five areas, including:

  • Diagnostics: Major General Lee Payne, Assistant Director for Combat Support at the Defense Health Agency (DHA).

  • Therapeutics: Sean Biggerstaff, Ph.D., Acting Director for Research and Development at DHA.

  • Vaccines: Matt Hepburn, M.D., Joint Project Lead CBRN Defense Enabling Biotechnologies.

  • Production and Distribution: Stacy Cummings, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Acquisition Enablers.

  • Security and Assistance: Andrew Kilianski, Chief Intelligence Officer for CBRN Defense.

Three focus areas: There are three core areas where the effort will accelerate the timeframe for countermeasures, including a vaccine, reaching the American public: 1) development, 2) manufacturing, and 3) distribution.

Commitment to affordability: The Trump Administration is committed to making these countermeasures affordable for the American people. As a condition of receiving support from Operation Warp Speed, companies will provide a donated allocation of countermeasures developed, including an eventual vaccine.

Financial resources: Congress has directed almost $10 billion to this effort through supplemental funding, including the CARES Act, and Congress has appropriated other flexible funding. Over $6.5 billion has been designated by Congress for countermeasure development through BARDA, along with $3 billion for NIH research.

Planned updates: Public updates on each step of Operation Warp Speed will depend on certain scientific milestones, which depend on the results of clinical trials (e.g., trials are sometimes halted before completion due to clear results).


Where does Operation Warp Speed fit in the US government (of GSEs) structure?

Operation Warp Speed appears to be wedged between HHS and DOD. Most of the funds, appropriated by Congress for "developing, manufacturing, and procuring vaccines and other medical supplies", were for HHS. Operation Warp Speed will use those funds and bypass the normal processes of HHS hoping to speed the development of vaccines for COVID-19.

Trump to name former pharma exec as vaccine czar, May 13, 2020

“Operation Warp Speed” is operating largely independently of the existing White House coronavirus task force, which is also shifting its focus toward vaccine development.

The initiative is being promoted by White House senior adviser Jared Kushner, and involves officials from the Defense Department and the Department of Health and Human Services.

Unveiling ‘Warp Speed,’ the White House’s America-first push for a coronavirus vaccine, May 12, 2020.

Conventional wisdom is that a vaccine for COVID-19 is at least 1 year away, but the organizers of a U.S. government push called Operation Warp Speed have little use for conventional wisdom. The project, vaguely described to date but likely to be formally announced by the White House in the coming days, will pick a diverse set of vaccine candidates and pour essentially limitless resources into unprecedented comparative studies in animals, fast-tracked human trials, and manufacturing. Eschewing international cooperation—and any vaccine candidates from China—it hopes to have 300 million doses by January 2021 of a proven product, reserved for Americans.

Those and other details, spelled out for Science by a government official involved with Warp Speed, have unsettled some vaccine scientists and public health experts. They’re skeptical about the timeline and hope Warp Speed will complement, rather than compete with, ongoing COVID-19 vaccine efforts, including one announced last month by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). “Duplication only leads to infighting and slowing people down,” says Nicole Lurie, former U.S. assistant secretary for preparedness and response, who advises the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), a nonprofit funding and helping coordinate COVID-19 vaccine efforts. “The U.S., and others around the world, should be engaged in this competition against the virus, not against one another.”

Although Warp Speed has not ruled out any type of vaccine, it will not consider ones made in China, such as the inactivated virus vaccine recently shown to protect monkeys from the coronavirus, a first. “We can’t partner with Chinese companies,” the official says. “That’s just not going to happen.” The decision was “above my pay grade,” he adds. But the chosen vaccines could be made by a company that is not headquartered in the United States. (White House trade adviser Peter Navarro in a February memo to the Coronavirus Task Force championed a “Manhattan Project” for COVID-19 vaccines that would prioritize U.S.-based companies.) [Emboldening original]

While the DOD's role has not been widely reported, some assets will be used during vaccine development and testing, but mostly during the distribution phase.

Once a product such as a vaccine is ready, the Department of Defense's involvement will enable faster distribution and administration than would have otherwise been possible using wholly private medical infrastructure.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    Ok, so Project Warp Speed is financed through the extra money allocated by CARES Act to BARDA? So it's basically a BARDA project? It's probably not a NIH project since the May 12 article in Science said that NIH doesn't own Warp Speed, but has its own vaccine program: "Warp Speed’s relationship to the NIH initiative, Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV), remains unclear." I guess I can ask this separately, but it seems to me it's almost the same q – Fizz May 16 at 16:54
  • Nonetheless, this is a more helpful/on-topic answer than Ted's so +1. – Fizz May 16 at 16:59
  • 2
    @Fizz - Though I haven't connected the dots, the financing appears to be through H.R.6074 - Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2020. Latest Action: 03/06/2020 Became Public Law No: 116-123. – Rick Smith May 16 at 17:12
  • I came here to ask whether this is a commercial proprietary secret for-profit project, separate from the coordinated open research of most other countries. I guess the answer is yes. – Keith McClary May 16 at 19:31
0

Trump is (what we used to call back in the day) an 'idea man', meaning that he tosses out ideas that make sense to him, and tasks subordinates with making them a reality. We can see this even back in his 'The Apprentice' days, where he would put out ideas and reward or punish apprentices based on their success in carrying them out. It's a particular style of leadership that works adequately when the person in charge has a firm grasp of the business at hand, such that he doesn't produce arbitrary, ridiculous, or impossible demands. But at the end of the day the details of implementation are up to other people.

The upshot is that we won't know precisely what relationship this will have to the US government until people other than Trump sit down and work out the details. It's much like the 'Space Force' in that way: Trump decided he wanted it long before he considered what its actual role or relation to the other military branches would be.

The operative idea in this case is that Trump has decided that the economy will reopen, but wants it to reopen in a way that it can be presented as a moral victory. For the decision to be perceived as morally sound, Trump must (in one way or another) render the problem posed by the coronavirus moot. To do that, he has three options, all of which he has floated in recent days:

  • He must assert that the virus will disappear on its own, in short order (e.g., his frequent comments that it will evaporate as the weather gets warmer, never to return)
  • He must assert that deaths are inevitable and acceptable, and that we must reopen the economy without worrying about it (his occasional attempts to frame the pandemic as a 'wartime' issue, where people must take heroic risks)
  • He must assert that we will find a vaccine for the virus, in short order (the OWS, along with his frequent claims that a vaccine is right around the corner)

Creating this OWS group absolves him of blame, regardless of outcome: if they succeed in rapidly developing and distributing a vaccine he can take credit; if they fail, he can blame them for the failure. From his perspective, it solves his political problem, such that he can push for opening the economy without being accused of callous disregard for human life.

| improve this answer | |
  • 2
    I don't think The Apprentice description really suits here, because those were highly edited productions revised to make good drama. There are plenty of stories about how winners were selected based on their actual success, only for Trump to name someone else, forcing the producers to piece together a narrative fo fit his conclusion. – jeffronicus May 16 at 15:23
  • 5
    The core of this question appears to be about whether this new program has a specific structure, like a GSE, not where it fits in Trump's mindset. – Chipster May 16 at 17:54
  • 1
    @Chipster: I'm aware of that. My point is that it does not fit anywhere, yet, and it won't until some subordinate fleshes out the details. It has no defined place in the administration or bureaucracy; it has no funding from Congress; it has no definite agenda or structure. It exists because Trump declared it exists, and tomorrow he could change his mind and it would evaporate like the morning dew. Trump's mindset is the only concrete variable in this entire equation. – Ted Wrigley May 16 at 18:14
  • 4
    Not a big fan of Trump and I basically agree with your assessment, but still this answer wanders way too far away from the question. If Warp Speed is just vaporware just say so and why (e.g. lack of funds or personnel) instead of trying to do a psychological analysis of Mr. Trump. – SJuan76 May 16 at 18:52
  • 1
    While there's a lot of relevant and accurate background information in this answer, it somewhat buries the core answer (i.e. noone knows, least of all the president), which would likely benefit from some form of emphasis. – Peter May 17 at 9:57

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .