I am curious about the pandemic and voting. I want to know about what if there are multiple states are unable to certify their election results in time. Would this mean that the Electoral College is "tied" and is thus sent to Congress because some states can't send electors?

For example, New York has not yet released the primary results and it has been three weeks so far. If this keeps going on til August we've got problems.


A President is elected if (s)he gets a majority of Electors appointed. The figure of 270 Electoral Votes needed to win is based on the assumption that every state appoints all of the Electors to which they are entitled.

If a state does not appoint Electors before the Electoral Votes are formally counted, then the number of Electoral Votes that would be needed for a President to be elected would decrease accordingly. If, for example, New York were not to appoint Electors, a candidate would need 255 Electoral Votes (a majority of 509) to win.

This is what happened in 1864, when the states under Confederate control did not appoint Electors, and two states that had recently returned to US control had their Electors rejected by Congress.

If a state is unable to certify election results, it would be up to the legislature of the state to decide whether to appoint Electors, and if so, on what basis they would be appointed.

| improve this answer | |
  • You should touch on what happens if the EC is unable to come to a consensus; you know, the house voting with 1 vote per state scenario... – dandavis Jul 20 at 9:18
  • @dandavis That's a good subject for a different question. The gist I got from this question is whether a failure to nominate Electors makes a contingent election more likely, to which the answer is no. – Joe C Jul 20 at 12:29

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .