There is a Twitter account called American Voter Bot which supposedly tweets profiles of individual US voters. I am not sure if these profiles are real, because I saw a few bizarre tweets that seem too odd to be true.

enter image description here

I am raising this profile in particular for a couple of reasons. First, only ten percent or less of black voters usually vote Republican. Second, the Republican Party is a mostly conservative party with only five percent of its members describing themselves as liberal. It does not make sense for those two reasons, even though this person does have some fairly conservative views.

I'm not going to dive further into the facts of this, but what I am going to say is that this account seems fake. Is this Twitter account based on real data?

  • 5
    This seems to be a better fit for Skeptics since it's evaluating the truth of a published claim. That aside, there is no way to judge whether this person is real from this information. While Black, liberal, Republicans are quite rare, people are complex and there certainly are a lot of them. With 328 Million Americans, I would be shocked if there weren't any Black, Liberal Republicans who voted for Trump in 2016 – divibisan Jul 20 '20 at 14:38
  • I’m voting to close this question because it's OT and better suited on Skeptics. – Martin Schröder Jul 20 '20 at 15:19
  • 2
    I'm not sure if a Twitter account with just 7800 followers fulfills the "notable claim" criteria of Skeptics, so I don't feel comfortable migrating this question. – Philipp Jul 20 '20 at 17:16
  • 2
    Saved by a good answer. Voting to Reopen, – Jontia Jul 20 '20 at 21:21

Yes, this account is based on real data. The article which explains the idea behind the bot can be found here, and the GitHub project here. In particular, the following extract is relevant:

We created a Twitter bot and dubbed it “@American__Voter” (a nod to another seminal and related study) that uses data from the 2016 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, a nationally representative survey of 64,600 American adults, to fuel the bot. Every hour, a computer program running the account (1) randomly selects an individual who took the survey, (2) selects 3 various issue positions held by the individual, (3) and spits out the individual’s party, self-described ideology, and those 3 policy preferences in one convenient tweet.

Sometimes, the voters profiled by American__Voter will make “logical” sense: for example, a voter will support both gun control, the affordable care act, and oppose immigrant deportation, all of which represent liberal attitudes. But that’s not what makes it interesting. Rather, we are interested in those less “constrained” Americans.

The tweet you've picked out is an example of one of those "less constrained" Americans.

If we look at the dataset, we can confirm that an individual exists. The main dataset contains 64,600 individuals. This then breaks down as follows:

  • 7,926 out of 64,600 respondents picked 'Black' when asked "What racial or ethnic group best describes you?"

  • Of these 7,926, 2,789 identified as Male.

  • Of these 2,789, 55 were born in 1954 (looking at the code, age is calculated as 2017-birthyr)

  • Of these 55, 31 had a college degree.

  • Of these 31, just one identified as either a 'Lean', 'Not very strong', or 'Strong' Republican.

This individual voted for Trump in 2016 (question CC16_410a), opposes the Clean Air Act (question CC16_333d), supports concealed-carry (question CC16_330e), opposes always allowing women to obtain an abortion as a matter of choice (question CC16_332a), supports eliminating mandatory minimums (question CC16_334a), and is registered to vote in Virginia according to Catalist.

So this voter in particular does exist, or at the very least, a CCES respondent reporting this data exists.

  • 5
    Or at least someone who answered the CCES with those answers exists. Whether or not they answered honestly, there's no way to tell. But one would hope so (and there's no reason to believe they didn't). – Bobson Jul 20 '20 at 15:45

You must log in to answer this question.