The President of the United States has a pretty much unrestricted power to pardon offenders. Are there any laws or regulations about how to grant pardons?

  • Could the President take a sharpie and write "I pardon you" on a napkin?
  • Could it be done by a tweet or verbally, in a press conference?
  • Could the President pardon someone and not inform anybody else at the time?
  • Does it even have to be dated or is a signature sufficient?

I realize those are six questions in one post, not one, but they all the same -- how strict or relaxed are the forms of granting a pardon?

  • 1
    See also this question on Arpaio's pardon: politics.stackexchange.com/questions/24786/… and you may want to look up the text of Ford's pardon of Nixon, as that was rather broad and non-specific (it's also quoted in the answer I gave on the prior link). Sep 6, 2020 at 6:19
  • @zibadawatimmy, a secret classification would be a formal act. I'm asking how informal a pardon can get. Also, dumping the five bullet points which end in question marks would not really change the scope of this question. The Nixon link in your answer is dead but the quote answers regarding specificity. I'll dump that bullet point from my question.
    – o.m.
    Sep 6, 2020 at 9:07
  • A secret pardon would also imply a secret conviction ? Sep 6, 2020 at 11:46
  • 1
    @StefanSkoglund, more a "get out of jail free" card if it stays secret until it is used. Say the president has some executive assistant do something patriotic but technically illegal, and the President provides the pardon to cover him. Even if the whole thing comes up much later.
    – o.m.
    Sep 6, 2020 at 13:59

1 Answer 1


Pardons are a specific type of executive order, which are a legal document. There are expectations of legal documents, but this is dealt with in common law, not in the constitution.

As a matter of common law, a definitive statement on whether you can pardon by tweet (for example) could only come from a court, and so would only occur if there was dispute. If a writ of habeas corpus were issued, and the prisoner produced the napkin claiming it to be a presidential pardon, then the court would have to inspect it. In principle, common law allows for most legal documents to have any form, but proving that a document is genuine and valid when it is not in the conventional form can be difficult.

So in terms of the specific questions: a napkin, tweet or verbal order may be sufficient to establish that a pardon has been granted, but would almost certainly come under close scrutiny, especially if the president denies the pardon at a later date. If the President intends the pardon to be valid, it is in their own interest to have it properly typed up, signed, dated and published.

A "get out of jail card" can't be issued because a pardon must occur after the commission of the crime. It is possible to inform someone that you would pardon them, and it is possible to pardon someone prior to inditement, but the president can't publically or privately pardon someone before they have committed a crime. If a president wants to get an aide to break the law for "patriotic" reasons, what they usually do is issue the pardon on the 19th of January in their final year. To make the pardon easy to enforce it is signed, and published.

In principle neither a signature nor a date is required, in practice it is easier for a President to get the pardon accepted if it is signed.

In many ways this is the same check-list as for other legal documents: A contract can be on a napkin, in a tweet, or agreed verbally. But if you want your contract to stand up to inspection in court you'd better get it notarised, signed, countersigned...


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .