I was reading about a US senate candidate for Michigan named John E, James.

A campaign website paid for by the Michigan Democratic State Central Committee makes the claim that he supports Trump abandoning negotiations for stimulus. Is there reasonable reason to believe that that is true?


This is a campaign website accusing James of supporting Trump's and McConnell's position on the basis that James has refused to make any comment on it. The accusation isn't unreasonable — Trump has endorsed James, and James is on record as wholeheartedly supporting Trump — but drawing inferences from non-statements is always questionable. File this in the credible but unproven drawer, I suppose...

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .