14

Looking at Google -> US elections, I see that in many US states the percentage of reporting is >95%. This leads me to think that the last few percentages of votes in some states take much longer to count than the first ~95% of votes. Why?

enter image description here

4
  • 4
    the good old 80/20 rule? joking aside, my guess is: lots of small counties and not so many huge counties. – Federico Nov 5 '20 at 9:37
  • 2
    Some states allow counting of ballots received after election day as long as they're postmarked before election day – waltzfordebs Nov 5 '20 at 16:30
  • Federico Pareto has spoken – Franck Dernoncourt Nov 5 '20 at 20:49
  • 2
    @waltzfordebs, actually, I believe that in all states , overseas ballots that have arrived 7-10 days post election day are counted. – BobE Nov 5 '20 at 21:20
7

Federico said in a comment

lots of small counties and not so many huge counties

That's part of it. Another part is that mailed ballots take longer to process. They must be opened and then read, and the vote then recorded. Where both in-person ballots and mail-in ballots are counted by a scanner, the in-person ballots are counted as they are cast, and the total is available on each machine instantly when the polls close. All that remains is to transfer the count from the machine to whatever central tallying process is underway. Mail-in ballots have to be fed into the scanner.

Azor Ahai -- he him raises another interesting point in the comments, which is that problematic ballots are counted last. These will generally be more time consuming, so even if they are counted in parallel they won't be completed until later on, and they will in general represent a small proportion of the total count.

5
  • 4
    Also, I would assume (but don't know for sure) that problematic and provisional ballots would be counted last (i.e. ones that can't be scanned automatically). I believe some states only count them if they matter. – Azor Ahai -him- Nov 5 '20 at 16:30
  • 1
    So counting the 80% totally good ballots is quick compared to fixing and curing the last 20 – Azor Ahai -him- Nov 5 '20 at 16:31
  • 1
    Then why has North Carolina been stuck at 94% for around 48 hrs now? – DonQuiKong Nov 6 '20 at 7:25
  • @DonQuiKong I don't know. Maybe you should ask a new question. – phoog Nov 6 '20 at 8:06
  • 1
    @DonQuiKong, North Carolina (like Alaska) is a special case that probably needs its own question. – Mark Nov 7 '20 at 3:35
5

To (hopefully) clarify a comment for people who might not be aware of this: when you see reporting percentages, those are frequently not percentages of votes tallied; rather, they're percentages of voting precincts reporting. Precincts aren't uniformly sized, and precincts with larger groups of voters can take quite a bit longer to count than e.g. the Dixville Notch vote in New Hampshire, where the votes of all 5-10 eligible voters can be tallied in a matter of minutes after the polls open at midnight.

6
  • Thanks I was indeed unaware of it. – Franck Dernoncourt Nov 5 '20 at 21:07
  • 3
    I think this is often true, but not always. At least, I remember in elections past that news reports explicitly said "of precincts," while now at least some are saying "of the expected vote total" or something like that. It seems that the difference in approach is related to the very much larger number of mail voters. – phoog Nov 5 '20 at 21:07
  • 3
    @phoog. Yes, this year, they are using the term of expected total because there is so much mail-in and early in-person voting. This answer is correct that "of precincts reporting" is how they usually do it on TV. I read this in a reliable article source before the election, but cannot remember where. – Damila Nov 5 '20 at 21:33
  • @phoog That's a very good point — I've added a weasel word to my post to address this. – Steven Stadnicki Nov 5 '20 at 21:44
  • Actually, the same google page, supposedly based on AP, says precincts in German and just total in English. – DonQuiKong Nov 6 '20 at 7:26
3

Because another Q was deemed to be a duplicate of this Q, I want to offer an answer to the question (from the closed Q): That "new" Q asks:

Why is the pace of vote counting so fast on the first day? Why does it slow down afterwards?

Consider the County where I live: On election day there were 212 precincts, each precinct has one or more voting machines. So that on election day there are actually 212+ machines that are counting in person votes simultanously.
Contrast that with the 3 counting machines (at the County Board) that are scanning all the mailed ballots. Even allowing that the precinct machines do not process at the same speed as the more expensive high speed (at the county central), having more than 60 times as many machines running simultaneously, more ballots can be counted per hour.

Notice that I have not addressed the pre-canvass requirements. In my county there are (about) 450-500 people "checking-in and validating" each in-person voter at the 212 precincts prior to issuing a ballot. Contrast that with the (about) 25 people who are "checking-in and validating" the mailed in ballots prior to those ballots being counted.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .