Inspired by this tweet:
In Detroit, there are FAR MORE VOTES THAN PEOPLE. Nothing can be done to cure that giant scam. I win Michigan! -@realdonaldtrump
Let us, for the sake of argument, assume the following claims from the tweet are true:
- "there are FAR MORE VOTES THAN PEOPLE" (i.e. there are invalid votes)
- "Nothing can be done to cure that giant scam." (invalid votes cannot be identified and removed from the count)
- Trump would have won Michigan except for Detroit. (implied in the tweet)
What would be likely to happen if these three points could be proven in court?