0

Between 1955-57, the president was Dwight Eisenhower, a Republican. But, at the same time, both the Senate and House were controlled by Democrats.

How difficult was it for the president to sign a bill when Congress will vote against the president? Does he need to invoke executive power to pass any bill?

1
  • 2
    You don't need to go back that far. Under much of President Obama's term both House and Senate were controlled by the Republican party. That would be a much better comparison to today, if that's what you are looking for. Nov 19 '20 at 14:46
3

You seem to misunderstand the process. Bills originate in congress, and the president serves as a gatekeeper deciding whether to accept bills passed by congress. The president can ask congress to pass a certain provision, but congress is under no obligation to accommodate such requests.

So first, one house passes a bill which has been introduced by one of its members (and probably has been approved by one or more committees before it can be brought to a vote). Second, the other house does the same, also subject to the committee process. Only after both houses of congress have passed a bill is it sent to the president for consideration. The president may sign the bill or reject it.

In the latter case, where there is a disagreement between congress and the president, only congress can overcome the disagreement, by overriding the veto, which requires each house to vote by a supermajority of two thirds or more.

1
  • For clarity "passed identical versions of the bill" Nov 19 '20 at 20:38
3

The past is a different country...

Back in the 50s the country was much more bipartisan, with support for the President on many issues coming from both Republicans and Democrats. Both parties were quite different from what they are now. Both had liberal and conservative wings and what it meant to be "liberal" or "conservative" was quite different from what it means now. The racial aspect of American politics was also quite different, with openly racist politicians in both parties, but particularly among the Democrats.

So, the president needed to negotiate with the Democrats, there was horse-trading and quid-pro-quo. But it simply wasn't the case that "both houses would vote against the President".

There is no executive power to pass a bill, the executive only has the power to block (veto) a bill and ask the Legislature to reconsider.

1
  • "openly racist politicians in both parties, but particularly among the Democrats." Hence, why the parties were more similar, they were mostly gradations of white men instead of all of America Nov 19 '20 at 20:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .