While researching the answer to this Skeptics.SE question, I came across (not entirely unexpected) biased-looking-to-me content on Wikipedia articles covering Fox News channel:
The main blurb of the article, as one of the only 4 paragraphs, stresses that "Fox News Channel has long been accused of promoting conservative political positions and it has been widely criticized for biased reporting".
The article itself has a major section devoted to "Controversies" (which mostly boil down to #1, but in detail), but also a whole separate article titled "Fox New Channel controversies".
The article has a whole section devoted to "Relationship with the Koch Brothers".
(I'll leave aside the fact that guilt by association is listed as one of the logial fallacies by Wikipedia :)
Now, none of that is unexpected nor - in and out of itself - very objectionable or biased except #1.
However, what interests me is, is Wikipedia's treatment of Fox News biased in that it is the ONLY US cable news channel subjected to such treatment? In other words, do other cable news channels or main broadcast networks articles on Wikipedia match this?
Do they have blurbs in main articles pointing to percieved political biases (for example, MSNBC or NBC itself, or New York Times, all 3 of which are just as frequently accused of political bias in the other directon as Fox News is).
Do those news sources have whole sections and large articles devoted to controversies, mainly dealing with political biases?
Are there sections in their articles devoted to their personnel relationship with major left wing figures, such as Soros, or left wing politicians?
I'm interested both in the current state of the articles, as well (or even more so) editing history, e.g. did someone try to introduce such equivalent statements/material and it was edited out; since the former reflects on individual contributor views and the latter more on Wikipedia's powers that be editorial policies.