Massachusetts Governor Baker says that he doesn't want to institute a state-wide mandate for masks in schools, he's leaving the decision up to individual municipalities.
A recent MassINC poll found that 81% of registered voters support a state-wide mandate. But if so many people are in favor of masking, why would we need a mandate? Isn't it reasonable to assume that anyone in favor of the mandate would also wear masks voluntarily, and make their children do so?
When asked why he's not mandating masks, he responded:
We made a strong recommendation on this, and as I said, I believe the vast majority, if not all, school districts are going to adopt that recommendation, which I think is a good thing.
Yet many people still seem to be criticizing Baker for his approach. If virtually all unvaccinated students will be masked under the current approach, what's the problem? This is far different from the states where the governor is actively prohibiting local mandates.