Does Putin have absolute power to do whatever he wants (e.g., start a nuclear war)? How powerful is he in the Russian government or does he need approval of some other body of government to do things like Joe Biden and Congress?

I am looking the the Democracy index on wikipedia and Russia is pretty far down so assuming he has a lot of power though still a bit off from North Korea which is rank 2nd to last.

  • 32
    Nobody can really ever answer this question of anyone. How much real power someone has is never truly known until they try to use it. All we can do is guess. How far will the Russian people let him go? How far will the world? If we had such answers there would not be so much uncertainty in politics. Power isn't something a person has - it's something they're allowed to exercise.
    – J...
    Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 14:19
  • 6
    @Trilarion Ostensibly, Russia has term limits for how many consecutive years a person can remain President. There is, however, a loophole, in that you can go back and forth between President and Prime Minister and reset the limit - which is exactly what Putin has done, serving in both roles twice each now, basically alternating with Dmitry Medvedev. Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 14:30
  • 3
    @J... it can at least be objectively answered how much power on-paper is given to him by national laws. For example, for a US president you could answer how much on-paper power is given by the Constitution and other laws.
    – qwr
    Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 21:27
  • 4
    @qwr Of course, and that's why it was a comment and not an answer. Still, it's not hard to find even US examples where the reality did not match the paper, either in cases where legitimate paper power was frustrated in some way or another, or cases where an absence of paper power did not prevent the exercise of same.
    – J...
    Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 22:20
  • 3
    @DarrelHoffman Actually, the constitution was amended in 2020 to reset Putin's and Medvedev's term counts to zero. So each could do 2 consecutive terms starting in 2024. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/….
    – Nimloth
    Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 22:28

3 Answers 3


On paper, the Russian government's political system looks quite similar to that of the United States, although, obviously, it isn't identical. Both have an elected President and separately elected legislators, and there is some degree of checks in balances embedded in the Russian constitution, although it isn't quite a fragmented as the U.S. Constitution. Neither constitution vests unilateral power to wage war in the President himself, but both do give the President the highest level of executive branch authority over the military.

Some of the devil is in the details. Russia is a hybrid between a strong Presidential system and a Westminster style parliamentary system, while the U.S. puts more distance between the cabinet and the legislature than Russia does. But the differences that do exist aren't really very material for the purposes of this question.

The answer is more a matter of the real world reality in which Vladimir Putin, whose current title is President of Russia, has de facto control of all material sources of political power in the country at the national level. This has great similarities to the manner in which the formalities of the political system in the Soviet Union were irrelevant because the Communist Party controlled everything from behind the scenes.

While Vladimir Putin most recently ran for President as an independent, his primary base of support and historical partisan allegiance in Russia is the United Russia Party which has controlled the national government in Russia since 2003. His close ally and the current formal leader of that political party, Dmitry Medvedev served as President of Russia from 2008–2012 (after which Putin served as President, he is currently in his fourth term) and as its Prime Minister from then until 2020, when a new United Russia Party Prime Minister began to hold that office. Vladimir Putin won 76.7% in the most recent Presidential election with United Russia's endorsement, United Russia holds 324 of 450 seats (more than two-thirds) in Parliament, and 60 of 85 Governors (almost three-quarters) in Russia (a position roughly equivalent in the organizational chart of Russia to a U.S. state governor) are United Russia party members.

Some of this control has been secured by extralegal means and political tactics that are dubious at best and probably involve illegal misuse of government resources and non-governmental criminal activity. These include side agreements with Chechen rebel leaders to have these rebels act as an unofficial militia for Putin, deals reached with "oligarchs" that trade favorable government dealings for loyalty, unfair rulings controlled from above in election administration, abusive uses of the Russian criminal justice system to persecute opponents, and harms experienced by political opponents with no official governmental involvement up to and including death and threats of death to the politicians and their families. Such tactics are hardly unexpected from a man who built his career prior to his involvement in politics (which started in the year 1990) in the notoriously ruthless KGB of the Soviet Union where he served from 1975-1999 first as a counter-intelligence agent rooting out spies in Russia, and then as a spy and covert operative in East Germany.

A complete catalog of how Putin came to be the dominant figure in Russian politics and specific instances of the tactics that he or others in his political movement used or are widely believed to have used would probably be too long to fit in a single Politics.SE answer of its own limited to that topic and is beyond the scope of this question.

For purposes of this question, how Putin's pervasive political authority came to be is just window dressing, and the material point is that he does indeed have such political authority and practical political power in Russia. His dominant power in the Russian political system is a point that even someone who takes umbrage at allegations that he acquired that power by improper means would generally not dispute.

In practice, the reality is basically a dominant party system. Putin's party and members of his coalition aren't the only legal party and dissent is not entirely suppressed as it would be in a totalitarian system of government. But, the control that he has, directly and through close and loyal allies, is sufficient, that he has near completely and absolute political power to do anything within the capacity of the Russian government.

Vladimir Putin certainly has, as a matter of practical reality, the ability to unilaterally decide to start a nuclear war. So does U.S. President Biden. This is true even though neither man has the formal power to declare and wage a war without legislative involvement.

  • 3
    Even on paper, the political systems are quite different. The Russian constitution was modeled more on the German one. Unlike the US, where the president is formally the head of the executive branch, the Russian president is above all three branches of power. Prime minister is the head of the executive (and, like it was in the USSR, is in a sorry position with all the responsibilities and little real power). Just, unlike Germany, the president is not a figurehead...
    – Zeus
    Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 4:40
  • 3
    @Zeus, a question of the level of detail. Russia is a republic with the president elected by the people. The prime minister is appointed by the president, confirmed by the Duma, a striking difference to the German system.
    – o.m.
    Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 5:46
  • 13
    "dissent is not entirely suppressed" May be a bit of an understatement. One could also say "dissent is almost entirely suppressed". Just look at all the opposition politicians behind bars. Also the jurisdiction is really not independent. Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 10:47
  • 1
    @Trilarion there are different kinds of dissent. Dissent against Putin is suppressed. Dissent against the ruling party/decisions is more or less allowed.
    – Dan M.
    Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 12:11
  • 9
    @quarague But Biden does have the power to decide to launch nukes - no Congress involved - which was what the OP asked about. That was precisely what was worrying people, rightly or wrongly, in the waning months of Trump's presidency. And that is different in nature from starting a war, where your assertion is correct: Putin might "pull an Ukraine", Biden could not "pull an Iran". Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 18:01

There is legal and there is practical.

Legally, the power of the russian president is defined in in the russian constitution, here's a link: http://www.constitution.ru/en/10003000-05.htm and the enumeration of his powers and responsibilities starts in §83

In reality, however, Putin isn't a one-man-show even though both he himself and the western media like to create that impression. His power depends on his friends and allies, on his ministers and secret service, the loyalty of his military and many other people and organisations. If he tried to do things that severely harm their interests, these people would let him know how quick and deep he could fall if they withdrew their support. It's not like that hasn't happened to previous rulers of Russia.

Putin - and almost everyone at that power level - is part of a network of connections, favours and interdependencies, and his actual power depends mostly on how well he can play the various parties in that net.

I have no insight into the details of that(1), but given how many people became rich under and thanks to Putin, he is likely to have a fairly large number of "friends" who owe him their fortune. He's also a previous KGB/FSB agent and most likely kept his connections there active. Like any good ruler, he will have several power bases so he doesn't depend on any one person or group of people.

(1) there are many articles available online that try to shine some light, such as:

  • It's good you cited the first part about legal powers Like the other answer, the rest should be sourced by some kind of research or scholarly source too. Otherwise it devolves into political speculation.
    – qwr
    Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 21:32
  • 1
    @qwr I thought that's fairly public knowledge. You can easily google plenty of articles, such as panamapapers.sueddeutsche.de/articles/56fec05fa1bb8d3c3495adf8 or edition.cnn.com/2017/03/28/europe/vladimir-putins-inner-circle/… or time.com/38632/putin-friends-rally-around-him
    – Tom
    Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 21:45
  • 12
    Yes I can google them, but it is the scholarly responsibility of the answer to back up what it says.
    – qwr
    Commented Feb 16, 2022 at 21:48
  • 1
    @qwr you are right. I've added the articles mentioned into the answer.
    – Tom
    Commented Feb 17, 2022 at 6:24
  • 1
    "His power depends on his friends and allies..." Would it then be okay to compare Putin to a Mafia godfather? There is no actual basis of his power except that he is the boss now. He crushes every opponent, so he is the only option left. Commented Feb 17, 2022 at 22:15

Russian Federation is de facto run by an outlet called Администрация Президента (President's Administration or АП).

Although it is supposed to be a purely technical service devised to keep the president's schedules and arrange meetings, in fact, it is a think tank that produces decisions for Putin to make and laws for State Duma to make.

АП is an extremely opaque structure since it holds no power so it is not accountable to anybody, its composition is mostly unknown. It is the people who think on behalf of Putin, act on behalf of Putin, etc. This explains how Putin manages to hold the power that he has - he's got special people for that.

Think of it as a Russian version of "deep state", gathered under one roof.

The people in State Duma, the parliament, are afraid of thinking and acting for themselves and are actively discouraged from doing so, they would get the laws' texts from АП and then vote them into actual laws. There are sometimes changes to these laws based on the public discussion/outrage, but they are always vetted by АП since you surely don't want to anger the АП, which would be both futile and detrimental to one's position.

I don't think Putin makes too many decisions by himself (if any), so usually, it's АП's decisions that are executed.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .