According to this article, India's richest 1% controls 73% of the country's wealth.
What is the scenario in the USA?
What percentage of the richest controls what percent of the wealth in the USA?
According to this article, India's richest 1% controls 73% of the country's wealth.
What is the scenario in the USA?
What percentage of the richest controls what percent of the wealth in the USA?
overall, the trend in the U.S. (and I suspect globally) has been to push wealth 'upward' to the 1% group at an increasing rate.
the chart below from Statista clearly illustrates trend from 1990 to 2021
top 1% - - - 32.1% of total wealth
next 9% - - 37.7%
next 40% - - 28.2%
last 50% - - 2%
So... in the U.S roughly 70% of the total wealth is controlled by 10% of the population and 1/2 of the population has almost nothing. The trends shown on chart show rich are continuing to get richer while poor are getting poorer faster.
This page by Pew Research indicates that the trend for the USA is similar. Mostly due to economic movement caused by the Great Recession, the last decade has seen the comparative income share of the middle class decrease and that of the upper class increase to 48%.
You asked specifically about wealth and the article addresses that as well. It states that the upper income wealth percentage increased to 79%, which would put it on par with that of your original indian number. The article explains this by stating that the majority of equity held by the middle class is tied to real estate (which did poorly in the recession), whereas the investments of the upper class are presumably more diversified. To quote the article:
The reason for this is that middle-income families are more dependent on home equity as a source of wealth than upper-income families, and the bursting of the housing bubble in 2006 had more of an impact on their net worth. Upper-income families, who derive a larger share of their wealth from financial market assets and business equity, were in a better position to benefit from a relatively quick recovery in the stock market once the recession ended.
However, the Pew values are in terms of low, middle and high income, and I had trouble finding what they used to define those buckets.
I did find a different page from cnbc reporting that the 1% wealth share as of 2021 was 32.3%. So that would indicate that it is less than that of India.
It depends on exactly how wealth is being defined.
It could either be defined as...
Defining wealth in terms of net worth doesn't always give an accurate picture. For example, if I earn a million dollars a year and spend it all, my net worth is zero at the end of the year, but I probably am living a pretty good life.
On the other hand, if I earn $50,000 a year but rent a cheap room somewhere, and don't go out much I might manage to save like $30K a year and have half a million dollars in the bank (net worth) by the time I am 35 years old.
So, lets define wealth in terms of income. In that case we can use the AGI numbers from the 1040 data the IRS publishes.
It seems that data lags by a few years, so the last published spreadsheet they give is this one for 2019.
Cell D42 of the spreadsheet shows that the lower 99% had an adjusted gross income of $7.6 Trillion in 2019 (out of a total of $12 Trillion for all individual returns).
The GDP of the united states is estimated at $21.4 Trillion in 2019.
Based on that...
The previously-accepted answer is correct in its numbers regarding the distribution of wealth between the top 1% (and 10%) and the bottom 50% in the U.S. In particular, according to the Federal Reserve System, the top 1% of American households control 32.3% of the wealth and the top 10% control 69.8%.
Wealth Distribution in the United States, Source: U.S. Federal Reserve System
However, I felt it necessary to add another answer to correct a serious mistake in the previously-accepted one: decreasing share of overall net worth among the bottom 50% definitely does not equate to actual decreasing net worth in that demographic.
The reality is that all four demographics broken out by the Fed (bottom 50%, 50-90%, 90-99%, and top 1%) have been seeing increasing net worth with only a few brief exceptions since shortly after the 2008-2010 recession. Far from getting poorer, the bottom 50% has seen its net worth increase from a low of $182 billion in Q2 of 2011 to $3,731 billion in Q4 of 2021. The increase has been especially dramatically in the last 5 years, increasing from $1,130 billion in Q4 2016 to the $3,731 billion figure in Q4 2021. This data is also from the Federal Reserve:
U.S. Net Worth by Percentile, Source: Federal Reserve System
Of course, net worth is defined as assets minus liabilities. The Federal Reserve also publishes data for assets and liabilities separately. From Q4 of 2016 until Q4 of 2021, the total assets of the bottom 50% in the U.S. increased from $5,668 billion to $9,352 billion, while liabilities (debt) increased from $4,539 billion to $5,620 billion of the same time period.
For the lower and middle classes in the United States, a very large portion of total assets (and, thus, net worth) tends to be in home value, while a large portion of liabilities tend to be in mortgages on those homes. This is largely why total assets increased quickly during the housing bubble from 2004 through 2007 (when housing prices were inflated,) then decreased from 2007 through 2011 during the recession when home prices returned to more reasonable levels. Of course, a lot of people losing jobs during the recession during that time also contributed to that loss of total assets in the bottom 50% during that period.
Assets and Liabilities of the Bottom 50% of Households in the U.S., Source: Federal Reserve System
The gray shaded areas in each of these graphs represent periods of economic recession (2 or more consecutive quarters of overall decrease in Gross Domestic Product.)