Supply through NordStream-1 is disrupted. Accusations were made that Russia was responsible for it. If Russia indeed was responsible for it, how would that be in Russia's interest?

  • Destroying its own source of income (and a very lucrative one at that), seems a bit counter-productive.
  • Also, NordStream-1 could have been a negotiating card for pursuing peace, which is now permanently closed.


Browse other questions tagged .