Politics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people interested in governments, policies, and political processes. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
It's obvious that Iran is not in favor of regulatory IAEA design safety reviews and among the talks she is firm that the nuclear program is merely for "peaceful purposes."
Is there a legitimate reason they have offered as to why they should not be inspected? How can we believe that their nuclear program is only for energy?
Iran does have genuine reasons for developing a civilian nuclear power industry. Iran's oil production is comparable to that of Iraq or Kuwait, but Iran has a much larger population. Between declining production and increasing domestic consumption of subsidized gasoline, Iran risks becoming a petroleum importer in a few years. Nuclear power (especially using Russian technology) is relatively cheap.
Iran also has very strong reasons to develop a nuclear weapons program. An obvious reason is that "the West" (including the United States and the United Kingdom) have not honored the agreements they made with two countries that gave up nuclear weapons programs -- Libya and the Ukraine. Iran also knows that an American threat of nuclear war was what forced the Soviets to leave Iran after the end of World War II.
If Iran was (hypothetically) willing to allow their (future) nuclear energy sector to be controlled by another country (such as Russia), Iran could build nuclear plants that would not be worrisome to the Europeans. (Bangladesh has made such a deal with the Russians.) An obvious reason for the Iranians to not do this is that Russia has repeatedly used its natural gas industry to try to exert political power over both Eastern European and Western European countries.
Iran does not oppose nuclear inspections. there are many things that can be discussed about Iran's nuclear program, as my friend Jasper talked about, that I thought are off-topic according to your question, but apparently not. it'd also be good if you could provide some evidence for your statements.
IAEA are welcome to visit Iran's Nuclear program's sites, however, they have themselves refused the offers. recently, Iran invited (International Atomic Energy Agency)IAEA to have a one managed access to Marivan, a region mentioned in an IAEA report in 2011 on suspected activities by Iran that could be relevant for developing nuclear weapons.
How would the people in US, especially those who most like to pillory Iran for not being docile and compliant, react if a bunch of foreigners, led by Iranians, wanted to come into the US and, completely at their own whims, go to any facility, unannounced, to poke around and inspect them? The howls of outrage would be heard half way across the globe, which means they'd be heard all around the globe, I guess.
Issues of sovereignty, security and prestige/image would make any country at least partially resistant to that kind of intrusion. That's why so many found it notable that Iran agreed to a level of inspections and deference to an inspection regime that has never been achieved before.
Debunking the Myths... - Center for Arms Control and Non-proliferation
Downvoters - please read what I actually say in my answer. I'm not even stating that Iran DOES oppose inspections. I'm pointing out that some wrangling or desire to mitigate access is a normal reaction from any nation.
