I am curious, is there anything preventing the President and Vice President from switching positions?

For example, could the President resign, and then the newly elevated VP appoint him to his old position?

Could this be done to avoid the effects of an impeachment?

  • 2
    Very interesting question. You'd have to wonder why the President would want to become the VP, though... It's a very powerless position
    – Bobson
    Mar 2, 2015 at 21:15
  • 2
    I wonder if the next season of VEEP will pull this off ... Jul 14, 2016 at 20:07
  • As a sidenote, in Mexico switching positions between the President and Vice President happened over and over again for a few decades and caused so many problems that the Mexican constitution now says that anyone who becomes president can never become president ever again, even the guy who was only president for one hour.
    – IKM
    Mar 29, 2020 at 23:41
  • Why even be a VP? Just appoint the ex-president to be your "aide" and have him rule from behind the curtain Jan 5, 2021 at 23:27

3 Answers 3


There is no law preventing this scenario from happening as you describe so it could happen in theory. The part that would make this practically impossible is that the VP appointment would require both houses to consent due to the 25th ammendments. It's very unlikely they would ever consent to an appointment of a president who resigned, especially one that was impeached.

  • 2
    If the President were incapacitated long enough that the VP had to serve as acting president, and the President--once he recovered--was happy with the job the VP was doing, could the President simply let the VP continue to serve as acting president unless or until something happened to him, but then resume his duties as President if the VP were incapacitated? The President wouldn't be entitled to cast tie-breaking votes in the Senate, but otherwise I don't think anything would forbid the President from being in "recovery" for as long as the VP was able to do the job, but...
    – supercat
    May 23, 2017 at 21:11
  • 1
    ...announce he was "recovered" and able to resume work as soon as the VP was no longer able to.
    – supercat
    May 23, 2017 at 21:11
  • 1
    @supercat If the President were incapacitated long enough that the VP had to serve as acting president -- I think you're overestimating here. There have been several cases in recent history where the VP served as acting Pres. for only a couple of hours. Similarly, the powers of the presidency aren't always transferred immediately when the Pres. is incapacitated.
    – tonysdg
    May 24, 2017 at 16:56
  • @tonysdg: I know the VP can perform presidential duties even for short periods of incapacitation, but in most such cases I would expect that the VP would typically let non-urgent matters wait for the President. If the President was going to be in surgery for 6 hours, for example, it would be unseemly for the VP to schedule a summit with a foreign head of state during the six-hours he had presidential authority. When I said "acting president", I meant to imply a duration long and uncertain enough that the President was not particularly expected to return to office.
    – supercat
    May 24, 2017 at 17:19
  • 1
    "the VP appointment would require the senate to consent" It would require a majority of the House and the Senate.
    – user102008
    Jan 27, 2018 at 0:02

In a non-scandal situation, this might be possible (although weird), but this wouldn't be an effective way to avoid impeachment.

  1. First of all, resigning doesn't necessarily stop the impeachment process. The Senate voted in 1876 to proceed with the impeachment trial of Secretary of War William Belknap, despite the fact that he had already resigned (he was ultimately acquitted).

  2. Secondly, an impeachment proceeding can (optionally) disqualify someone from holding any future public office. If the Senate voted (subsequent to removal) to do that, they wouldn't even be eligible to be appointed to VP.

  3. Thirdly, according to the 25th Amendment, a Vice Presidential appointment is subject to confirmation by the Sentate both houses of Congress (thanks user102008). So unless there was a full turnover in Congress, the prospect of them confirming someone they just removed (or were starting the process to remove) seems vanishingly unlikely.

  4. Finally, Congress could still impeach a newly appointed VP, even for things they did before entering that office. See page 15 of this Congressional report on Impeachment (PDF):

Judge Archbald was convicted on four articles alleging misconduct in his then current positions as a circuit judge and Commerce Court judge, and on a fifth article that alleged misuse of his office both in his then current positions and in his previous position as U.S. District Judge.

So you could still impeach that new VP for his prior conduct as President, or even his conduct after he resigned from office.

And I would imagine that if he had already been impeached as president, it might be possible to repeat that process very quickly, based on all the prior investigation and evidence (and then invoke the clause to disqualify them from holding any future office).

  • "a Vice Presidential appointment is subject to confirmation by the Senate" It is subject to confirmation by a majority of the House and the Senate.
    – user102008
    Jan 27, 2018 at 0:02
  • @user102008 Fixed, thanks. Linked to the relevant text of the 25th Amendment.
    – BradC
    Jan 27, 2018 at 19:20

This could not happen to avoid impeachment (The Democratic Speaker of the House said he wanted the VP position filled before continuing for Impeachment so that it didn't come off as a coup to Republicans following Spiro Agnew's resignation from the position).

That said, the VP can become Acting-President for a time where the POTUS is not able to perform his duties but will return at a later time (George H.W. Bush after the attempted assassination of Ronald Regan as well as Dick Cheney during surgeries that George W. Bush underwent.). Upon return to health, POTUS resumed duties and the Acting-President was demoted to VP.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .