Geneva was the headquarters of League of Nations even though it did not participate in WWI. It has the UNOG from 1946 though Switzerland has not joined UN till 2002. It was the headquarters of OPEC till 1965 though Switzerland is not one of the oil producing countries. In addition to the above, Geneva is the headquarters for a number of International organizations. Why do many International organizations have their headquarters in Geneva?

  • I did not know where to post the question, but I thought Politics is somewhat related. I know the tags are not related. As I am new to stack exchange I don't know what fits and what doesn't. Apr 19, 2015 at 13:44
  • 2
    At some point, it's likely because that's where other international organizations are.
    – cpast
    Apr 19, 2015 at 23:46

4 Answers 4


Imagine your home country got invaded by the fictional superpower of Elbonia. The Elbonian soldiers burned down your house, abducted and/or killed several of your friends and relatives and kicked your dog. Now a self-proclaimed humanitarian help organization with their headquarter in Elbonia comes along and says: "Yeah, very bad what our government did to you, but we are here to help you. We can bring you to a refugee camp where you receive totally non-poisoned food and completely non-experimental medical care and will certainly not be tortured for information. You just need to trust us". Would you come along?

Switzerland is a country which has long maintained a policy of neutrality and non-involvement in international affairs. For almost 500 years and counting Switzerland refused membership in any military alliance, and is also wary of any civil treaties. It is not an EU member despite its geographic position right in the center of Europe. Until 2002 Switzerland wasn't even a member of the United Nations.

That means an organization based in Switzerland can deny that their actions are influenced by the interests of the government of the country they reside in.

As the second-largest city in the country, Geneva provides a good infrastructure for an international organization.

  • Is the use of Elbonia here intentional?
    – user29681
    Mar 10, 2020 at 1:41
  • @Chipster I used to be an avid reader of the Dilbert comics and used to use Elbonia as a stand-in fictional country in my answers. I stopped doing that after I found out that the creator also has a blog where he publishes strong political opinions. I don't want to give the impression that I share or oppose his views. Nowadays I prefer to use the fictional countries from the game Papers, Please instead.
    – Philipp
    Mar 23, 2020 at 13:16
  • "For almost 500 years...": For only the last 208 of those years was Geneva a part of Switzerland.
    – phoog
    Sep 5, 2022 at 15:28

Historically, Geneva has the condition of being in Switzerland, which is a country where international treaties are signed in the modern history. After the Napoleonic wars and joined the Helvetic Confederation, here celebrated most of the international treaties, which have huge impact in the Western World; Starting in 1863 when Henri Dunant founded the International Red Cross (ICRC) and still having an office in the city.

They were local to the first Geneva Convention, the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, the Third Geneva Convention of 1929 among others which are historically and juridically important. Also, Geneva was the place where the League of Nations was established; when the League didn't work, they used the Geneva infrastructure to build the United Nations in 1946.

Interesting fact is that most of the recognized international NGOs has office over there and where it held the World Economic Forum or tweet it #WEF for more information.

  • 1
    You just iterated that Geneva is the center of international treaties and NGOs, but you are not really providing an explanation why.
    – Philipp
    Apr 23, 2015 at 16:59

First and foremost, Switzerland has a long tradition of strict neutrality, which helps diplomacy. Plus, it has gorgeous landscapes, right in the middle of Europe (transportations, of course, weren't as efficient as today). It's also French speaking and French was the language of the elite and diplomacy in the 19th century. Many aristocrats went to Switzerland on holiday or sent their kids there to private schools.

In general, it's also difficult for large and powerful countries to agree to grant the seat or leadership of any international organisation to each other (the UN in New York being one major exception). See for example the citizenship of the UN secretaries general, the seat of the European Union, etc.

Switzerland was therefore able to attract some of the earliest modern international organisations, like the Universal Postal Union and International Telecommunication Union. Furthermore, the Red Cross movement was initiated by a citizen of Geneva.

Add to that the fact that Europe was still much more influential than it is today and that Switzerland did not participate in the First World War and you can see why it was well-positioned to attract the seat of the League of Nations (incidentally, another small non-belligerant, the Netherlands, also hosts a number of international organisations). And many of the organisations based in Geneva are now part of the “UN system”, which succeeded the League of Nations.

The current situation kind of follows from this history. There is no obvious reasons why international organisations would choose Geneva today but the infrastructure, workforce, etc. is in place and it would be very costly to relocate all this.

And Switzerland has always been keen on protecting this heritage and punching above its weight diplomatically. It frequently offers itself as a mediator between warring countries, acting as a protecting power and hosting foreign interest sections in Swiss embassies everywhere. (Here as well there is another small neutral country playing a similar role: Sweden.)

The same dynamic would also seem to apply to OPEC. It couldn't very well be hosted in one of the major production countries and many of the smaller ones are unstable. In a continuation of its 19th century tradition, the Geneva area is still a common destination for rich and powerful people, e.g. from the Middle East. Many heads of state have villas on the lake shore or go to Geneva hospital to get medical treatment. I don't quite know why OPEC moved but its new seat (Vienna) is similar in many ways (secondary UN seat, small neutral country – albeit for a much shorter time than Switzerland).


This is possibly exactly because Switzerland was a country that was rarely participating in the wars. That's why people hold money in Swiss banks and put international organizations there.

  • I'd say Switzerland's neutrality has not much to do with people holding its money there. I'd say it is more a matter of low interests and economical benefits. Do not forget that Switzerland is a fiscal tax-haven. Apr 23, 2015 at 15:51
  • 1
    @MikelUrkia Bank secrecy was more important than taxes. Taxes for regular people are not particularly low, there is no easy way to pay low taxes for individuals without actually living there for most of the year, and company taxes are only interesting in very few places in Switzerland (e.g. Zug). But the thing is that because Swiss banks were extremely discrete and it was extremely hard for the authorities in other countries to obtain information, you could easily do something illegal in your country, park your money in Switzerland and evade detection. It's becoming less and less true.
    – Relaxed
    Apr 25, 2015 at 10:02
  • @Relaxed I totally agree with your statements. Like you say in your last sentence, the banking secrecy is becoming less and less true. Leaks like the Falciani list demonstrates this. Apr 26, 2015 at 8:49
  • 2
    @MikelUrkia Switzerland is NOT a tax-heaven for the regular citizens like me. We do pay heavy taxes just like everyone else. Only very rich people and very large companies get advantages - and this is highly controverted but the right wing parties manages to maintain the statu quo.
    – Bregalad
    Apr 26, 2016 at 17:33
  • @Bregalad you have per-citizen pension which is actually "negative tax".
    – Anixx
    Apr 26, 2016 at 17:39

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .