There was an inscription commemorating those who died from the UK and the US bombing Dresden in February 1945, when an estimated 22-25,000 civilians were killed.
Recently, according to Bild, the inscription was removed. Why was this done?
-
13From the article, it seems like the removal was done without the knowledge of the city, which implies that an unknown private person did it, which has been reported to the police as criminal damage. Unless they reveal themselves and announce their reasons, we are unlikely to know why it was done.– CalethCommented Jan 18 at 9:36
-
2It was merely an inscription that was removed, not a "Memorial Wall". (I've edited the question accordingly.)– user103496Commented Jan 18 at 13:30
-
3What strikes me much more is the description that it had been "clandestinely removed". Removing a deep engraving, covering a couple of square meters, is serious masonry work and should take hours at least. How could no one have observed this, and confronted the workers?– ccprogCommented Jan 18 at 14:22
-
1@Caleth: According to a statement by the mayor of Dresden, this removal had been planned since 2019 and was removed during planned construction. So, it should be easy to figure out why it was done: I assume there must have been a vote and discussion in the city council, so it should be in the records. Even if it was just an executive decision, there should be an order with a rationale. And in fact, the mayor has given a reason: the plaque on the park bench was covered up by people sitting on the bench and the bench, like every park bench, was often covered in graffiti.– Jörg W MittagCommented Jan 18 at 21:41
-
12@ccprog Re "How could no one have observed this, and confronted the workers?" If you put on clothing similar to the clothing worn by city maintenance workers (sometimes just putting on a safety vest will do) and go about the work confidently (1) you become "invisible" to most people (2) nobody will challenge you.– njuffaCommented Jan 18 at 21:46
Add a comment
|
3 Answers
Removal of the inscription had been planned since 2019, but the city failed to inform about it being put into action now. An information stele near the bench that had been removed temporarily will be restored.
According to MDR
[Oberbürgermeister] Hilbert führte weiter aus, dass die Inschrift in der Lehne einer Bank auf dem Altmarkt vor einigen Tagen bei Bauarbeiten entfernt wurde. Das sei planmäßig erfolgt. Er verwies auf entsprechende Absprachen zur Neugestaltung des Platzes aus dem Jahr 2019, zu der eben auch die Entfernung der Gravur in der Lehne einer Sitzbank gehört habe. "Eine rechtzeitige Information über das geplante Vorgehen wäre unerlässlich gewesen", so Hilbert.
Der OB verteidigte zugleich die Entfernung der Inschrift. Sie sei wiederholt in die Kritik geraten, weil sie nicht würdig genug sei. Entweder würden Menschen davor sitzen und sie verdecken oder die Bank werde für Graffiti missbraucht...Eine 2020 errichtete Erinnerungsstele, die bei den Bauarbeiten auf dem Altmarkt beschädigt worden war, soll zeitnah wieder aufgestellt werden.
[Mayor] Hilbert went on to explain that the inscription on the back of a bench on the Altmarkt was removed a few days ago during construction work. This was done according to plan. He referred to corresponding agreements on the redesign of the square from 2019, which also included the removal of the engraving on the back of a bench. "Timely information about the planned procedure would have been essential," said Hilbert.
The mayor also defended the removal of the inscription. It had been repeatedly criticised for not being dignified enough. Either people would sit in front of it and cover it up or the bench would be misused for graffiti...A memorial stele erected in 2020, which was damaged during the construction work on the Altmarkt, is to be reinstalled in the near future.
Neo-Nazis present the bombing of Dresden as a war crime. Dresden was a major rail transport and communication centre, housing 110 factories and 50,000 workers in support of the German war effort. Also Nazi Germany previously had already bombed European cities. Anyway Neo-Nazis push the view that the bombing has been a war crime so the monument was probably removed for not to give them a place for meetings and demonstrations. The estimated number of victims for this bombing is reported as 20,000 here, while as high as 500,000 have been claimed in Nazi PR.
From the source referenced in question:
Neonazis nutzen den jährlichen Gedenktag, den 13. Februar, um die Stadt als Bühne für Aufmärsche zu missbrauchen
That translates to
Neo-Nazis use the annual memorial day, February 13, to abuse/misuse the city as a stage for demonstrations
Maybe not exactly this monument right now but the city in general, and they might decide to use also the monument in the future one day.
This answer does not attempt to answer to the question if the bombing has really been a war crime, the statement that some (not Nazis) are saying, also increasing the estimated number of victims till 35,000 and claiming it had limited military significance.
-
I mean by modern standards those are war crimes and even back then you could argue that way en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerial_bombardment_and_international_law especially when the intent is to harm the "enemy moral" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_bombing That being said Nazis and Neonazis use them to equate that to their own crimes or use them as justification. Which is beyond anything reasonable especially since they've done the same and worse themselves several times.– haxor789Commented Aug 21 at 9:38
The bombing of Dresden has been extensively used by Nazis for propaganda purposes. This started during the war and there is a continuance all the way to the modern remembrance events, where Nazis "remember" the bombing (often hand in hand with conservatives).
The goal of this is and was guilt reversal. Germany started a war to exterminate all Jews & they were stopped. Bombing Dresden was a part of the defeat of Germany.
Nazis, conservatives, and other revisionists instead want to present themselves as victims of foreign aggression & downplay German guilt as it relates to the Holocaust (often calling the Dresden bombing "Bombenholocaust" in an attempt to relativize the actual Holocaust).
That's the background and motivation to remove the inscription. As the article makes clear though, the city doesn't say that it is responsible & wants to add a plaque saying that the 13th of February is one of the most important days of remembrance.
-
5Is there any source that says this was the reason for the removal is or this a guess on your part? As you stated in the article it appears that it is unknown who removed it.– Joe WCommented Jan 18 at 13:59
-
5The bombing of Dresden cause just 3 months before Nazi Germany ceased to exist, therefore there was not much opportunity for Nazis to use it for propaganda purposes. Slaughterhouse-Five is likely more notable than any Nazi and neo-Nazi efforts combined.– alamarCommented Jan 18 at 14:04
-
@JoeW I can't speak to the motivation of people, but the question asked for the political background. This is that. The memorials are inseparably linked to the yearly Nazi march.– timCommented Jan 18 at 15:12
-
@alamar the extensively sourced wikipedia article on the topic disagrees & it's no coincidence that one of the largest Nazi marches has always been the yearly march in Dresden.– timCommented Jan 18 at 15:16
-
@alamar en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… Yes apparently the Nazis did use that as propaganda and Dresden wasn't the only bombed city. That being said en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_bombing_during_World_War_II the Nazis had already done the same thing or worse since the beginning of the war and including bombing London en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Blitz . Also Neonazis trying to use that for propaganda is real en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…– haxor789Commented Aug 21 at 10:06