A proposed deal/strategy to block an RN win in the 2nd round:
The high turnout on Sunday means some 300 constituencies are now facing potential three-way run-offs which, in theory, favour the RN.
To prevent these three-way run-offs and block the RN, France’s centre-right and centre-left politicians have long practiced what they call a “republican front”, whereby the third-placed candidate drops out of the race and urges voters to rally behind the second-placed candidate. [...]
On the left, the Socialist and LFI leaders also called on their third-placed candidates to drop out to block the RN.
The conservative Republicans party, which split ahead of the vote with a small number of its lawmakers joining forces with the RN, has yet to take a stance.
I wonder though what that means if the deal is followed as such, in terms of seat distribution between the LFI and Macron's party. How many LFI candidates are 3rd and would have to drop out vs. how many in Macron's party?
N.B. a closer reading suggests that Macron's party didn't quite endorse the idea exactly as LFI proposes:
Edouard Philippe explicitly called on the candidates from his party to drop out if they were in third position and rally behind candidates from the centre-left to the centre-right, excluding the RN and LFI.
Emphasis on "and LFI" mine. So, Macron's party candidates will apparently not drop out if they're 3rd behind RN & LFI.
Essentially, would Macron's party be nearly wiped out (in parliament) if the deal is followed exactly as LFI proposes, given that overall Macron's party was third in terms of vote share in the 1st round? Or are there many constituencies where Macron's party isn't 3rd nonetheless?