Ted Wrigley
  • Member for 2 years
  • Last seen this week
Stats
47,969
reputation
998k
reached
381
answers
0
questions
Loading…
About

A note to those interested...

I spent a lot of years in academic settings, and consequently I have a deep aversion to pedantic donkey work. People frequently tell me that I should source things more — even when they fundamentally agree with my posts — and I can see their point. But it isn't going to happen. I will source things (as a rule) under two conditions:

  1. When I need to refer to an academic theory or author that people might not be familiar with
  2. When I need to explain a particularly controversial point

Otherwise, I'm simply going to rely on my insight, acumen, and skills to produce reasoned analysis of questions I decide to answer. Things I see as common knowledge, common sense, or easily accessible via Google or Bing will be presented as given. If I miss connecting with people who prefer a more concrete empirical style... So be it, and my apologies in advance.

Let me know if I make any specific factual errors; I will correct them. If you wish to dispute some particular point, please do so analytically, and I will respond in kind. I will do due diligence when I must, and I do love to get into philosophical debates, but I will shrug off mere complaints that lack any effective or substantive argumentation.

I know, I know... But we all have our crosses to bear.

18
gold badges
128
silver badges
167
bronze badges
4,006
Score
216
Posts
57
Posts %
1,069
Score
30
Posts
8
Posts %
818
Score
26
Posts
7
Posts %
481
Score
17
Posts
4
Posts %
424
Score
23
Posts
6
Posts %
374
Score
23
Posts
6
Posts %
Top posts
View all questions and answers