Skip to main content
Became Hot Network Question
Tweeted twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1522274929672179718
added 32 characters in body
Source Link
Ekadh Singh
  • 3.1k
  • 2
  • 18
  • 46

States such as Missouri are planning to make it illegal for a citizen of Missouri to go to a different state to get an abortion if Roe is ultimately overturned. It attempts to evade legal challenge by using the same "allow private citizens to sue" legal caveat/enforcement mechanismterms (which some would view as loopholes) that Texas enacted last year.

Ignoring the enforcement mechanism, which some believe has shaky legal ground of its own, what sort of precedent exists currently on a state regulating its citizens conduct while out-of-state?

States such as Missouri are planning to make it illegal for a citizen of Missouri to go to a different state to get an abortion if Roe is ultimately overturned. It attempts to evade legal challenge by using the same "allow private citizens to sue" legal caveat/enforcement mechanism Texas enacted last year.

Ignoring the enforcement mechanism, which has shaky legal ground of its own, what sort of precedent exists currently on a state regulating its citizens conduct while out-of-state?

States such as Missouri are planning to make it illegal for a citizen of Missouri to go to a different state to get an abortion if Roe is ultimately overturned. It attempts to evade legal challenge by using the same "allow private citizens to sue" legal terms (which some would view as loopholes) that Texas enacted last year.

Ignoring the enforcement mechanism, which some believe has shaky legal ground of its own, what sort of precedent exists currently on a state regulating its citizens conduct while out-of-state?

added 52 characters in body; edited tags; edited tags
Source Link
JJJ
  • 39.7k
  • 10
  • 122
  • 184

States such as Missouri are planning to make it illegal for a citizen of Missouri to go to a different state to get an abortion if RoeRoe is ultimately overturned. It attempts to evade legal challenge by using the same "allow private citizens to sue" legal caveat/enforcement mechanism Texas enacted last year.

Ignoring the enforcement mechanism, which has shaky legal ground of its own, what sort of precedent exists currently on a state regulating its citizens conduct while out-of-state?

States such as Missouri are planning to make it illegal for a citizen of Missouri to go to a different state to get an abortion if Roe is ultimately overturned. It attempts to evade legal challenge by using the same "allow private citizens to sue" legal caveat/enforcement mechanism Texas enacted last year.

Ignoring the enforcement mechanism, which has shaky legal ground of its own, what sort of precedent exists currently on a state regulating its citizens conduct while out-of-state?

States such as Missouri are planning to make it illegal for a citizen of Missouri to go to a different state to get an abortion if Roe is ultimately overturned. It attempts to evade legal challenge by using the same "allow private citizens to sue" legal caveat/enforcement mechanism Texas enacted last year.

Ignoring the enforcement mechanism, which has shaky legal ground of its own, what sort of precedent exists currently on a state regulating its citizens conduct while out-of-state?

Source Link
Gramatik
  • 10.5k
  • 3
  • 32
  • 56

If Roe is overturned, what is the legality of laws prohibiting crossing state lines for abortion?

States such as Missouri are planning to make it illegal for a citizen of Missouri to go to a different state to get an abortion if Roe is ultimately overturned. It attempts to evade legal challenge by using the same "allow private citizens to sue" legal caveat/enforcement mechanism Texas enacted last year.

Ignoring the enforcement mechanism, which has shaky legal ground of its own, what sort of precedent exists currently on a state regulating its citizens conduct while out-of-state?