Timeline for Have previous divisive SCOTUS rulings led to politically driven population shifts?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2022 at 3:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackPolitics/status/1547778079786876932 | ||
| Jul 8, 2022 at 22:29 | comment | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | Brown did displace some Black children after schools were closed to then in Virginia, but whether the displacement was significant in the long run... | |
| Jul 8, 2022 at 22:22 | comment | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | Have a look at econweb.umd.edu/~kaplan/big_sort_APSA.pdf But honestly tying any one particular SCOTUS ruling to the sorting observed (as opposed to more general political trends) is going to be hard. | |
| Jul 8, 2022 at 22:13 | comment | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | Not that "shifts" and "sorting" are not the same thing. The answer below denies net influxes, but bidirectional population movements in the US far exceed those. In other words, sorting can happen (at least in theory) without any net shifts. | |
| Jul 8, 2022 at 19:45 | comment | added | DJClayworth | Since 1970 black proportion of populations in southern US states has grown. I'm pretty sure that wouldn't have happened without Supreme Court rulings on civil rights. | |
| Jul 8, 2022 at 19:36 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jul 9, 2022 at 4:02 | |||||
| Jul 8, 2022 at 19:34 | comment | added | TCooper | @Bobson One expert isn't a consensus, and there could be instances in the past showing it has happened regardless of one expert's opinion now(affected by current events). Just because I've researched doesn't mean I've researched extensively. A single conflicting expert opinion would lend credence to the ideas outlined here: philarchive.org/archive/FINWED - multiple experts or evidence in agreeance, or the opposite would alter the accepted "facts". I've found many SE users, that while not experts themselves, are extraordinary when it comes to compiling expert opinions. | |
| Jul 8, 2022 at 19:17 | comment | added | Bobson | I'm not sure I understand what you're looking for. The expert says "we don't know". If there were any evidence to suggest that the common thought were right, the expert should know about it. They'll certainly know better than Random Stack Overflow User #12345, anyway. | |
| Jul 8, 2022 at 19:09 | history | reopened |
convert TCooper Philipp♦ |
||
| S Jul 8, 2022 at 17:11 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Jul 8, 2022 at 19:19 | |||||
| S Jul 8, 2022 at 17:11 | history | edited | TCooper | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Changed to (hopefully) remove any need to predict the future, and focus on prior evidence
Added to review
|
| Jul 8, 2022 at 16:55 | history | closed | Philipp♦ | Not suitable for this site | |
| Jul 8, 2022 at 16:54 | answer | added | hszmv | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 8, 2022 at 16:51 | history | edited | TCooper | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited tags; edited title
|
| Jul 8, 2022 at 16:44 | history | asked | TCooper | CC BY-SA 4.0 |