Timeline for As of 2024, how can Russia escalate the war in Ukraine?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
26 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 10 at 19:56 | answer | added | 264 champagne bottles on ice | timeline score: 3 | |
| May 7 at 1:23 | history | edited | user28660 |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 25 at 22:45 | history | edited | user28660 |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 17 at 8:37 | vote | accept | Alexei | ||
| Apr 17 at 7:38 | answer | added | Ivan Borsuk | timeline score: -1 | |
| Apr 16 at 11:51 | history | reopened |
user28660 Alexei SurpriseDog Toffomat sfxedit |
||
| Apr 13 at 12:13 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Apr 16 at 11:51 | |||||
| Apr 13 at 12:13 | history | closed |
Joe W 264 champagne bottles on ice Danila Smirnov NoDataDumpNoContribution user28660 |
Opinion-based | |
| Apr 10 at 5:20 | comment | added | vsz | Russia could easily cut most or all of the underwater cables which provide almost the entire Internet bandwidth, causing crippling damage to the world, but most of the damage would be to Western countries as they rely on it the most. | |
| Apr 9 at 12:04 | history | edited | Allure | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Specify which war is being referred to
|
| Apr 9 at 11:40 | comment | added | user13964273 | According to some western official it is legal to target military supply bases far behind of the front line. One of Ukrainian supply bases is called "Rammstein". Recently you also can hear repeatedly "we don't want to start a war against XXX, we just destroy some of their military potential". | |
| Apr 9 at 7:17 | answer | added | Stančikas | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 8 at 20:53 | comment | added | Gray Sheep | They do not really conscript. It is very, very far from a total war like mass mobilization as the Ukrainians do. If their state would be in risk, or Putin's successor would be much more hardliner, they could quickly mobilize tens of millions of people, and attack other countries with it. Or, the West would start to defend Ukraine with corps, the result would be likely a quick Russian win in the first years, and no one knows, what after. Note, both WW1 and WW2 was won by the West by industrial production... but this time, the enemy is Russia. At a point, such a WW3 would become likely nuclear. | |
| Apr 8 at 13:58 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Apr 8 at 13:57 | history | protected | Philipp♦ | ||
| Apr 8 at 13:24 | answer | added | Tadeusz Kopec | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 8 at 8:33 | answer | added | Steve | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 7 at 23:37 | answer | added | alamar | timeline score: 15 | |
| Apr 6 at 17:02 | answer | added | Pete W | timeline score: 8 | |
| Apr 6 at 15:43 | comment | added | Timur Shtatland | Voting to keep open. Re: “ Questions asking for the internal motivations of people, how specific individuals would behave in hypothetical situations or predictions for future events are off-topic, because answers would be based on speculation and their correctness could not be verified with sources available to the public.”: I just provided an answer with such references. Please read it before voting to close or to keep open. Thanks! | |
| Apr 6 at 15:23 | history | edited | Timur Shtatland | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
I suggest that would is better than should in this sentence. But I could be wrong. :)
|
| Apr 6 at 15:20 | answer | added | Timur Shtatland | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 6 at 14:56 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 8 at 20:53 | |||||
| Apr 6 at 14:48 | answer | added | John Dallman | timeline score: 4 | |
| Apr 6 at 14:38 | comment | added | Joe W | There are likely many ways they could do that and any answer would be just guessing at what they are thinking | |
| Apr 6 at 13:49 | history | asked | Alexei | CC BY-SA 4.0 |