8

Wikipedia says:

Gibraltar is largely a self-governing British territory on the tip of the Iberian Peninsula with a population of about 30,000 people, whose territory is claimed by Spain. It continues to be listed as an NSGT though its residents expressed a preference in two referendums to retain the status quo. In 1967, they were asked whether to retain their current status or to become part of Spain. The status quo was favoured by 12,138 votes to 44. In 2002, a proposal for a joint British–Spanish administration of the territory was voted down by 17,900 votes to 187. (The "no" vote accounted for more than 85% of Gibraltar's entire electorate). The United Nations did not recognise either referendum, with the 1967 referendum being declared in contravention of previous UN resolutions.

Given that the UK has a veto in UNSC etc. (and Spain doesn't), this level of UN opposition seems surprising. Alas the references cited by Wikipedia are dead links. So, how did the UN, or at least the member states that were effectively involved in those decisions (to ignore the Gibraltar referenda) motivate their decision? (Did they e.g. explicitly agree with the Spanish argument that the present Gibraltar population are "imported aliens"?)

1 Answer 1

8

The resolution rejecting the 1967 referendum was UN Resolution 2353 (XXII), which refers to Resolution 1514 (XV) - in particular paragraph 6, which states:

  1. Any attempt aimed at the partial or total disruption of the national unity and the territorial integrity of a country is incompatible with the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.

It also refers to Resolution 2070 (XX) and 2231 (XXI), in which the General Assembly (including both the UK and Spain) invited the two countries' governments first to enter into, then to continue, talks "with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples". The later resolution also calls upon the UK to "expedite, without any hindrance and in consultation with the Government of Spain, the decolonization of Gibraltar, and to report to the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples".

According to the 1967 UN Yearbook, the UK submitted a draft resolution to this committee, which would;

(a) recall the General Assembly's request of 20 December 1966 to take into account the interests of the people of the territory;
(b) note the declared intention of the administering power to consult the people of the territory about their views as to where their interests lay by means of a referendum to be held on 10 September 1967; and
(c) note the statement by the administering power that, in accordance with the requirements of the General Assembly's resolution of 20 December 1966 on the question of Gibraltar,

However, this resolution was rejected by the committee by a vote of 3-10, with 11 abstentions. The arguments presented against the holding of the referendum were as follows:

  • The representative of Spain maintained that the provisions of the Assembly's resolution of 14 December 1960 containing the Declaration on the granting of independence were applicable to Gibraltar. That resolution had set forth the principles of self-determination and had embodied the principles of national unity and territorial integrity of all countries. Neither the Special Committee nor the General Assembly, the Spanish representative said, had specified that the principle of self-determination should apply to the civilian population of Gibraltar. The condition laid down by the United Nations for the return of Gibraltar to Spain was that the interests of the inhabitants should be respected; the Spanish Government had offered to respect those interests and had made a number of suggestions to the United Kingdom as to how they might be safeguarded.
  • Spain considered that the continued British presence on a portion of Spanish soil was tantamount to the dismemberment of the national unity and the territorial integrity of Spain; as long as such dismemberment persisted the colonial situation in Gibraltar would also persist. By its resolution of 20 December 1966, the General Assembly had requested the United Kingdom to expedite, without any hindrance and in consultation with the Government of Spain, the decolonization of Gibraltar. The United Kingdom had interrupted the negotiations for the decolonization of Gibraltar and had decided to hold a referendum in the territory without previous consultations with Spain. This decision not only violated the Treaty of Utrecht of 1713 but also the United Nations resolutions.
  • The representative of Uruguay said that the referendum decided upon by the United Kingdom represented a departure from the system of bilateral negotiations called for by the Assembly's resolution of 20 December 1966 on the Gibraltar question. Another reason for objecting to the referendum was that, according to the Treaty of Utrecht, Spain was to have preferential option to recover the territory should a change of status be contemplated. Any referendum organized by the British who inhabited the territory was devoid of legal value.
  • Mali and Tunisia expressed support for the Spanish position, in particular with regard to the proposed referendum.
  • The United Republic of Tanzania said that the General Assembly had called upon the administering power to enter into consultations with Spain to ensure not only decolonization, but also the type of decolonization and the process followed. The proposed referendum would defeat the purposes of the Assembly's resolution of 20 December 1966 on the Gibraltar question.
  • The representative of Tunisia said that his delegation was opposed, not to the holding of a referendum as a means of determining the views of the population, but rather to the manner in which it was being organized by the administering power.

Instead, a revised resolution sponsored by Chile, Iraq, Syria and Uruguay was passed by a vote of 16-2 with 6 abstensions, which would eventually become Resolution 2353 in the General Assembly.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .