"The first federal recall election was held on January 14, 2014." What was the name of the court case?

Question

The last paragraph of a now-deleted answer states that there was a court case brought to recall a federal representative.

The first federal recall election was held on January 14, 2014 in accordance with the provisions for good governance stipulated of the Continental Congress 2.0. The people have chosen to assert their federal powers with transitional government. The process of enforcement of the recall is a separate question.

What was the name of the court case? I have performed several web searches but was unable to find an answer.

Answer 1

There is no court case that has found the 'right to recall' a Congressional Representitive.

The Senate has published through the Congressional Research Service the reasoning why you cannot recall a Congressman/Senator. (You might be interested in the Judical branches rulings on similar matters pg. 10 in the pdf, pg. 7 as printed)

As to removal by recall, the United States Constitution does not provide for nor authorize the recall of United States officers such as Senators, Representatives, or the President or Vice President, and thus no Member of Congress has ever been recalled in the history of the United States. The recall of Members was considered during the time of the drafting of the federal Constitution in 1787, but no such provisions were included in the final version sent to the states for ratification, and the specific drafting and ratifying debates indicate an express understanding of the framers and ratifiers that no right or power to recall a Senator or Representative in Congress exists under the Constitution.

The organization, the99Declaration did meet in Philidelphia, PA at what they called the Continential Congress 2.0, not to be confused with the original Second Continential Congress. Of 800 people who voted for themselves to attend as representatives of their districts, only 78 attended. Although they mention in their list of grieviences that congressional representatives should not serve back-to-back terms, no recall is mentioned.

As to the99declarations Tenth Amendment argument, there have been some SCOTUS decisions on term limits, among others regarding federal officials, and they concluded:

Petitioners’ Tenth Amendment argument misconceives the nature of the right at issue because that Amendment could only “reserve” that which existed before. As Justice Story recognized, “the states can exercise no powers whatsoever, which exclusively spring out of the existence of the national government, which the constitution does not delegate to them .... No state can say, that is has reserved, what it never possessed.” 1 Story §627.41

Answer 2

A constitutional authority board (willofthepeople.agency) claims a people-initiated recall took place according to George Washington's process and cannot include the states' process because that is a conflict of powers. Maybe they have some info.