Today's (Nov 5, 2024) online edition of the New York Times has an image showing electronic voting booths in a polling station in Brooklyn, New York. (original URL of NYT image)
The booths have screens which prevent looking into the booth from the side, but they are open to the room (and not e.g. to a wall or large screen) so that suitably positioned onlookers can see what is going on. Indeed, there is one person in the picture who will likely have at least a partial view of a booth where voting is going on at that moment. Additionally, a couple is seen together in front of the same voting machine.
In Germany, this would not be permitted. While the general air here in the polling stations is typically relaxed and friendly, the secrecy of the vote is strictly observed. Booths are open towards a wall, and nobody can be in that space when it is occupied. You certainly cannot go to the booth together. These procedures are strictly monitored and enforced.
Now the referenced image does not appear to show anything nefarious but the secrecy is there for a reason: It precludes the possibility to buy votes, eliminates peer pressure for example in a marriage etc.
Article II, section 7 of the constitution of New York says (emphasis by me):
All elections by the citizens [...] shall be by [some method] prescribed by law, provided that secrecy in voting be preserved.
Does "all" not include presidential elections, or is this simply not taken seriously?