5

A convenient infographic from The Economist shows that the third runway at Heathrow is apparently an important election promise by the Conservative party:

enter image description here

But why is it such a big deal? Is it really an issue on the same scale as leaving the Single Market or cutting immigration?

1 Answer 1

3

It's actually not in the Tory manifesto since not everyone in the party agrees on this and Prime Minister Theresa May used to be against this but supports it now.

To understand why it's a big deal, it's important to understand the pros and cons against it. Wikipedia does have an informative page on that - Expansion of Heathrow Airport.

Basically, businesses and the aviation industry mainly support the idea of building a third runway since it will allow the airport to accommodate more passengers and put the airport on equal footing as other main European airports.

However, people are against it as the construction may cause air pollution and hundreds of homes need to be demolished to make way for the expansion.

This BBC article sums up all the opposition against the expansion.

  • We need to reduce, not increase, emissions

    Heathrow generates 50% of UK aviation emissions. This makes 6% of total emissions, according to Department for Transport figures. With a third runway and as the UK as a whole cuts emissions, Heathrow's contribution to overall UK emissions would rise significantly by 2050, some calculate to as much as 50% of total.

  • Health of Londoners at risk

    A Greater London Authority (GLA) report suggested Heathrow would even now breach the EU regulations on levels of Nitrous Oxide due to come into force in 2010. Extra flights would only make this worse.

  • Economic case overstated

    Many of the new passengers the extra runway would bring would be transit passengers. According to former BA boss Bob Ayling they would spend little or nothing in London, only boosting airline profits.

  • Impact on the local area

    Transport infrastructure around Heathrow already struggles. The extra demands would create gridlock.

  • Alternatives

    For historical reasons, Heathrow is badly located. It is the only major airport with flight paths over a large capital city, for instance. Some, like London Mayor Boris Johnson, believe this is a perfect opportunity to start again and propose a new airport in the Thames Estuary.

2
  • 1
    "t is the only major airport with flight paths over a large capital city, for instance." it's cherry picking (for "capital") at best and totally false at worst.
    – motoDrizzt
    Commented May 28, 2017 at 12:33
  • 1
    Indeed. There are several other metropoles in Europe with airports right in the city (like Hamburg). But the conflict between industry interests and resident interests is always a hot-button issue where this is the case. For example, Berlin is currently replacing it's inner city airport with a new one at the southern outskirts of the city.
    – Philipp
    Commented May 28, 2017 at 13:46

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .